Lester I Harrison1, Victoria Sessions2, Christopher J Wiggenhorn1, David Chalmers3, Pui Leung4, John Efthimiou5. 1. Clinical and Biostatistics, Drug Delivery Systems Division, 3M Center, St Paul, Minnesota, USA. 2. Clinical Programme Management, 3M Health Care Ltd, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK. 3. Data Sciences, Quotient Clinical, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Clinical Research, Quotient Clinical Ltd, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK. 5. Independent Respiratory Consultancy, 5 Carey Close, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to test the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the salmeterol component of two pressurized metered dose inhalers that delivered a combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SM/FP). METHODS: This was a six-way crossover study in 43 adult subjects, using a single blind design (subject blinded to product and clinical assessor blinded for all measurements). Each subject received single doses of two, six, and twelve inhalations from test and reference products that delivered SM/FP as 25/125 mcg per inhalation. Heart rate, QTcB, and plasma potassium and glucose were monitored over 6 h. RESULTS:Safety equivalence was shown by relative potency analysis for primary endpoints of maximum heart rate and maximum QTcB, since the 90% confidence intervals for both endpoints were within the acceptance limit of (0.67, 1.50). There were six secondary analyses for relative potency and equivalence was met for five of these endpoints. There were also 18 pairwise comparisons performed at each dose level. No statistical differences (95% confidence intervals included zero) among these pairwise comparisons were seen at the two-inhalation dose (therapeutic dose) or the six-inhalation dose. At the supratherapeutic dose of twelve inhalations, the test product was either comparable to or statistically less than that of the reference product for all comparisons. Overall, the results demonstrated comparable systemic safety. No differences were seen between the products in reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The safety equivalence of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the SM component of the test and reference SM/FP products was demonstrated.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The aim of this study was to test the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the salmeterol component of two pressurized metered dose inhalers that delivered a combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SM/FP). METHODS: This was a six-way crossover study in 43 adult subjects, using a single blind design (subject blinded to product and clinical assessor blinded for all measurements). Each subject received single doses of two, six, and twelve inhalations from test and reference products that delivered SM/FP as 25/125 mcg per inhalation. Heart rate, QTcB, and plasma potassium and glucose were monitored over 6 h. RESULTS: Safety equivalence was shown by relative potency analysis for primary endpoints of maximum heart rate and maximum QTcB, since the 90% confidence intervals for both endpoints were within the acceptance limit of (0.67, 1.50). There were six secondary analyses for relative potency and equivalence was met for five of these endpoints. There were also 18 pairwise comparisons performed at each dose level. No statistical differences (95% confidence intervals included zero) among these pairwise comparisons were seen at the two-inhalation dose (therapeutic dose) or the six-inhalation dose. At the supratherapeutic dose of twelve inhalations, the test product was either comparable to or statistically less than that of the reference product for all comparisons. Overall, the results demonstrated comparable systemic safety. No differences were seen between the products in reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The safety equivalence of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the SM component of the test and reference SM/FP products was demonstrated.
Authors: Carole Evans; David Cipolla; Tim Chesworth; Eva Agurell; Richard Ahrens; Dale Conner; Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Myrna Dolovich; William Doub; Anders Fuglsang; Afredo García Arieta; Michael Golden; Robert Hermann; Günther Hochhaus; Susan Holmes; Paul Lafferty; Svetlana Lyapustina; Parameswaran Nair; Dennis O'Connor; David Parkins; Ilse Peterson; Colin Reisner; Dennis Sandell; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Marjolein Weda; Patricia Watson Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Anthony P Davenport; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Lester I Harrison; Victoria Sessions; Christopher J Wiggenhorn; David Chalmers; Pui Leung; John Efthimiou Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Peter T Daley-Yates; Rashmi Mehta; Robert H Chan; Simona X Despa; Margaret D Louey Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; John A Cidlowski; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Christopher Southan; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Michael Spedding; William A Catterall; Doriano Fabbro; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Lester I Harrison; Victoria Sessions; Christopher J Wiggenhorn; David Chalmers; Pui Leung; John Efthimiou Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 4.335