Siiri Kõljalg1, Rando Mändar2, Tiina Sõber3, Tiiu Rööp4, Reet Mändar5. 1. MD, PhD, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu 50411, Estonia. 2. School of Law, University of Tartu, Näituse 20, Tartu 50409, Estonia. 3. MSc, Tartu Kristjan Jaak Peterson Gymnasium, Kaunase puiestee 70, Tartu 50704, Estonia. 4. MSc, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu 50411, Estonia. 5. MD, PhD, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu. Ravila 19, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: While contamination of mobile phones in the hospital has been found to be common in several studies, little information about bacterial abundance on phones used in the community is available. Our aim was to quantitatively determine the bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones. METHODS: Altogether 27 mobile phones were studied. The contact plate method and microbial identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer were used for culture studies. Quantitative PCR reaction for detection of universal 16S rRNA, Enterococcus faecalis 16S rRNA and Escherichia coli allantoin permease were performed, and the presence of tetracycline (tetA, tetB, tetM), erythromycin (ermB) and sulphonamide (sul1) resistance genes was assessed. RESULTS: We found a high median bacterial count on secondary school students' mobile phones (10.5 CFU/cm2) and a median of 17,032 bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies per phone. Potentially pathogenic microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus cereus and Neisseria flavescens) were found among dominant microbes more often on phones with higher percentage of E. faecalis in total bacterial 16S rRNA. No differences in contamination level or dominating bacterial species between phone owner's gender and between phone types (touch screen/keypad) were found. No antibiotic resistance genes were detected on mobile phone surfaces. CONCLUSION: Quantitative study methods revealed high level bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones.
INTRODUCTION: While contamination of mobile phones in the hospital has been found to be common in several studies, little information about bacterial abundance on phones used in the community is available. Our aim was to quantitatively determine the bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones. METHODS: Altogether 27 mobile phones were studied. The contact plate method and microbial identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer were used for culture studies. Quantitative PCR reaction for detection of universal 16S rRNA, Enterococcus faecalis 16S rRNA and Escherichia coli allantoin permease were performed, and the presence of tetracycline (tetA, tetB, tetM), erythromycin (ermB) and sulphonamide (sul1) resistance genes was assessed. RESULTS: We found a high median bacterial count on secondary school students' mobile phones (10.5 CFU/cm2) and a median of 17,032 bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies per phone. Potentially pathogenic microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus cereus and Neisseria flavescens) were found among dominant microbes more often on phones with higher percentage of E. faecalis in total bacterial 16S rRNA. No differences in contamination level or dominating bacterial species between phone owner's gender and between phone types (touch screen/keypad) were found. No antibiotic resistance genes were detected on mobile phone surfaces. CONCLUSION: Quantitative study methods revealed high level bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mobile phones; children; contact plate; potentially pathogenic microbes; quantitative
Authors: Nicholas Peak; Charles W Knapp; Richard K Yang; Margery M Hanfelt; Marilyn S Smith; Diana S Aga; David W Graham Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Erin M Hanna; Timothy J Hamp; Iain H McKillop; Farah Bahrani-Mougeot; John B Martinie; James M Horton; David Sindram; Raad Z Gharaibeh; Anthony A Fodor; David A Iannitti Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Massimiliano Chetta; Valeria Bafunno; Rosalba Grillo; Antonio Mele; Pietro Lo Perfido; Michele Notarnicola; Francesco Cellini; Rosa Anna Cifarelli Journal: Biotechnol Prog Date: 2012-07-16