| Literature DB >> 28626688 |
Anouk F Duque1, Vânia S Bessa1, Paula M L Castro1.
Abstract
Aerobic granular sludge constitutes a novel technology for wastewater treatment. This study focused on the effect of 2-fluorophenol (2-FP) shock loadings on the microbial community diversity present in aerobic granules before and after inoculation with a bacterial strain able to degrade 2-FP, Rhodococcus sp. strain FP1. After bioaugmentation, apart from strain FP1, five culturable bacteria were isolated from the 2-FP degrading granules, belonging to the following genera: Serratia, Chryseobacterium, Xanthomonas, Pimelobacter and Rhodococcus. The latter two isolates are able to degrade 2-FP. Changes in the aerobic granules' bacterial communities related to 2-FP shock loadings were examined using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rRNA gene pool. Numerical analysis of the DGGE profiles showed high diversity with an even distribution of species. Based on cluster analysis of the DGGE profiles, the bacterial communities present in the aerobic granules changes were related to the sampling time and the 2-FP concentration fed.Entities:
Keywords: 2-Fluorophenol (2-FP); Aerobic granular sludge; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE); Microbial community diversity; Rhodococcus sp. strain FP1
Year: 2014 PMID: 28626688 PMCID: PMC5466197 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Summary of the operating conditions tested in the SBR and performance.
| Operating conditions | Phase | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before bioaugmentation | After bioaugmentation | ||||||
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | |
| Length of operation (days) | 0–99 | 100–209 | 210–222 | 223–229 | 230–266 | 267–400 | 401–444 |
| Cycle time (h) | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Influent feeding (min) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Aeration (min) | 112 | 112 | 652 | 652 | 412 | 172 | 172 |
| Settling (min) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Effluent withdrawal (min) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| HRT (h) | 7.9 | 7.9 | 31.6 | 31.6 | 21.1 | 10.5 | 10.5 |
| Influent CODacetate | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Inlet 2-FP concentration (mM) | 0 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| 2-FP biodegraded (mM) | NA | 0 | 0.056 ± 0.009 | 0.104 ± 0.008 | 0.117 ± 0.010 | 0.106 ± 0.005 | 0.100 ± 0.009 |
NA: not applicable.
CODacetate: chemical oxygen demand based on acetate.
2-FP concentration inside the bioreactor.
Values are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Phylogenetic affiliation of bacterial isolates extracted from the aerobic granules.
| Isolate | Accession no. | Phylogenetic affiliation | Closest relative (accession no.) | Similarity (%) | Origin | 2-FP degradation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBR1 | γ-Proteobacteria | 99 | Dead freshwater fish | No | ||
| SBR2 | Flavobacteria | 99 | Experimental biofilter | No | ||
| SBR3 | γ-Proteobacteria | 100 | 13 m water layer of Hugangyan Maar Lake in summer | No | ||
| SBR4 | Actinobacteria | 99 | Swine waste biotreatment | Yes | ||
| SBR5 | Actinobacteria | 100 | Gasoline station | Yes | ||
| SBR6 | Actinobacteria | 99 | Isolated from soil | Yes |
Fig. 1DGGE community fingerprint of the SBR 16S rRNA gene population. Gel lanes contain samples collected during SBR operation (days are indicated on the top of the lanes). Lane M: DNA marker constructed using 2-FP degrading bacteria. Bands that were excised for sequence analysis, indicated with an arrow, are labeled with the same number as in Table 3.
Phylogenetic affiliation of DGGE band DNA sequences.
| Band no. | Sample day | Phylogenetic affiliation | Closest relative (accession no.) | Similarity (%) | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 217 | γ-Proteobacteria | Uncultured | 100 | Activated sludge in a membrane bioreactor |
| S2 | 217 | Unknown | Uncultured bacterium clone F1Q32TO05F4L3V ( | 99 | Guri wastewater (suspended biomass) |
| S3 | 227 | γ-Proteobacteria | 99 | Aerobic granular sludge reactor | |
| S4 | 301 | α-Proteobacteria | Uncultured Rhizobiales bacterium clone PSB-8 ( | 95 | Fluvo-aquic soil of Yellow River |
| S5 | 301 | Actinobacteria | 99 | Inoculated strain | |
| S6 | 408 | β-Proteobacteria | 92 | Sediment sample of natural spring | |
| S7 | 408 | γ-Proteobacteria | 94 | Drinking water network | |
| S8 | 408 | Nitrospirae | Uncultured | 95 | Trickling filter/solids contact basin from full-scale wastewater treatment plant |
| S9 | 408 | Unknown | Uncultured bacterium clone F1Q32TO06G2588 ( | 95 | Guri wastewater (attached biomass) |
Fig. 2Cluster analysis of bacterial communities based upon DGGE profiles. Similarities were calculated using the Bray–Curtis measure.
Fig. 3Ordination biplot for principal correspondence analysis (PCA) of DGGE banding patterns (samples indicated using the day and operational phase of sampling). Axis 1 explains 29.9% and axis 2 explains 24.1% of the observed variance (p < 0.01).