Literature DB >> 15303758

Microbial communities and their interactions in biofilm systems: an overview.

S Wuertz1, S Okabe, M Hausner.   

Abstract

Several important advances have been made in the study of biofilm microbial populations relating to their spatial structure (or architecture), their community structure, and their dependence on physicochemical parameters. With the knowledge that hydrodynamic forces influence biofilm architecture came the realization that metabolic processes may be enhanced if certain spatial structures can be forced. An example is the extent of plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer in biofilms. Recent in situ work in defined model systems has shown that the biofilm architecture plays a role for genetic transfer by bacterial conjugation in determining how far the donor cells can penetrate the biofilm. Open channels and pores allow for more efficient donor transport and hence more frequent cell collisions leading to rapid spread of the genes by horizontal gene transfer. Such insight into the physical environment of biofilms can be utilized for bioenhancement of catabolic processes by introduction of mobile genetic elements into an existing microbial community. If the donor organisms themselves persist, bioaugmentation can lead to successful establishment of newly introduced species and may be a more successful strategy than biostimulation (the addition of nutrients or specific carbon sources to stimulate the authochthonous population) as shown for an enrichment culture of nitrifying bacteria added to rotating disk biofilm reactors using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and microelectrode measurements of NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, and O2. However, few studies have been carried out on full-scale systems. Bioaugmentation and bioenhancement are most successful if a constant selective pressure can be maintained favoring the promulgation of the added enrichment culture. Overall, knowledge gain about microbial community interactions in biofilms continues to be driven by the availability of methods for the rapid analysis of microbial communities and their activities. Molecular tools can be grouped into those suitable for ex situ and in situ community analysis. Non-spatial community analysis, in the sense of assessing changes in microbial populations as a function of time or environmental conditions, relies on general fingerprinting methods, like DGGE and T-RFLP, performed on nucleic acids extracted from biofilm. These approaches have been most useful when combined with gene amplification, cloning and sequencing to assemble a phylogenetic inventory of microbial species. It is expected that the use of oligonucleotide microarrays will greatly facilitate the analysis of microbial communities and their activities in biofilms. Structure-activity relationships can be explored using incorporation of 13C-labeled substrates into microbial DNA and RNA to identify metabolically active community members. Finally, based on the DNA sequences in a biofilm, FISH probes can be designed to verify the abundance and spatial location of microbial community members. This in turn allows for in situ structure/function analysis when FISH is combined with microsensors, microautoradiography, and confocal laser scanning microscopy with advanced image analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15303758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  20 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.

Authors:  Hongyue Dang; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Microbial composition and structure of aerobic granular sewage biofilms.

Authors:  S D Weber; W Ludwig; K-H Schleifer; J Fried
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Uniform categorization of biocommunication in bacteria, fungi and plants.

Authors:  Günther Witzany
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-28

4.  Architecture of a nascent Sphingomonas sp. biofilm under varied hydrodynamic conditions.

Authors:  V P Venugopalan; M Kuehn; M Hausner; D Springael; P A Wilderer; S Wuertz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Escherichia coli biofilms.

Authors:  C Beloin; A Roux; J M Ghigo
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Non-invasive in situ monitoring and quantification of TOL plasmid segregational loss within Pseudomonas putida biofilms.

Authors:  Hongyan Ma; Kristy N Katzenmeyer; James D Bryers
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Conjugative DNA transfer induces the bacterial SOS response and promotes antibiotic resistance development through integron activation.

Authors:  Zeynep Baharoglu; David Bikard; Didier Mazel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Intra- and inter-species interactions within biofilms of important foodborne bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Even Heir; Mickaël Desvaux; Michel Hébraud; Trond Møretrø; Solveig Langsrud; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas; Miroslava Kačániová; Katarzyna Czaczyk; Hülya Ölmez; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of Biofilm Formation by Rhodopseudomonas palustris Growth under Two Metabolic Modes.

Authors:  Chase Kernan; Philicia P Chow; Rebecca J Christianson; Jean Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of bacterial and structural dynamics in aerobic granular biofilms.

Authors:  David G Weissbrodt; Thomas R Neu; Ute Kuhlicke; Yoan Rappaz; Christof Holliger
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.