Literature DB >> 28625495

Assessing the Effect of an Intensive 2-Week Surgical Training and Innovation Program for High-School Students.

Brian Labadie1, Roshan M Patel1, Jessica Gandy Labadie1, Christina Hwang1, Zhamshid Okhunov1, Jaime Landman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The summer surgery program (SSP) was founded in 2012 as an educational program for students at the critical juncture between high school and college to engender interest in medicine, science, and innovation. This program has a distinct emphasis on innovation and problem solving based on real-life operative challenges identified by students during surgical observation in the operating room. The effect of the SSP regarding postsecondary education and career goals was evaluated by participants using a follow-up questionnaire.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using web-based survey administered to students at least 1 year after participation in the SSP. Associations between demographics and survey responses were made using Fisher's exact test and a Bonferonni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons. PARTICIPANTS: Between July 2012 and August 2015, 119 students enrolled in the SSP. We sent a web-based questionnaire link to all participants who completed the program. The questionnaire contained 80 questions assessing the participant's interest in studying medicine or science in college, knowledge of health care, and their appreciation and understanding of innovation.
SETTING: UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Institutional tertiary care center.
RESULTS: In total, 77 (64.7%) of 119 students who matriculated in the SSP completed the follow-up survey; the mean number of years after the program was 2.09 years. Nearly all students reported the program increased their interest in studying medicine or science in college (97.4%), led them to a better understanding of their own career goals (93.5%) and made them more confident in their ability to succeed in a career in health care (88.3%). The majority indicated the program led them to better understand the training and schooling required of doctors and surgeons (94.8%), and led them to better appreciate the roles of different medical specialties (96.1%). Overall 96% of students reported that the program led them to better understand the importance of innovation and 86% of the respondents noted they better understood the process of innovation. Participants in the SSP were confident they would be able to become a health professional (p < 0.0001). Of note, there was no drop off in the ratings for the program when comparing classes that were 1, 2, 3, or 4 years after their SSP experience.
CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up survey revealed that the 2 week SSP had a markedly, long lasting positive effect on participants in areas of academic, career, and innovation-related variables.
Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; high-school student feedback; innovation; program evaluation; surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625495      PMCID: PMC5928801          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  2 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of techniques to prevent laparoscopic fogging.

Authors:  Austin Drysch; Kenneth Schmitt; Brittany Uribe; Renai Yoon; Zhamshid Okhunov; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 2.  The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students.

Authors:  Marilyn A Winkleby
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.893

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.