Literature DB >> 28624483

Biomarker Profiles of Acute Heart Failure Patients With a Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.

Jasper Tromp1, Mohsin A F Khan2, Robert J Mentz3, Christopher M O'Connor4, Marco Metra5, Howard C Dittrich6, Piotr Ponikowski7, John R Teerlink8, Gad Cotter9, Beth Davison9, John G F Cleland10, Michael M Givertz11, Daniel M Bloomfield12, Dirk J Van Veldhuisen1, Hans L Hillege13, Adriaan A Voors14, Peter van der Meer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors used biomarker profiles to characterize differences between patients with acute heart failure with a midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and compare them with patients with a reduced (heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) and preserved (heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]) ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on biomarker profiles in acute HFmrEF.
METHODS: A panel of 37 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains (e.g., myocardial stretch, inflammation, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, hematopoiesis) were measured at admission and after 24 h in 843 acute heart failure patients from the PROTECT trial. HFpEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥50% (n = 108), HFrEF as LVEF of <40% (n = 607), and HFmrEF as LVEF of 40% to 49% (n = 128).
RESULTS: Hemoglobin and brain natriuretic peptide levels (300 pg/ml [HFpEF]; 397 pg/ml [HFmrEF]; 521 pg/ml [HFrEF]; ptrend <0.001) showed an upward trend with decreasing LVEF. Network analysis showed that in HFrEF interactions between biomarkers were mostly related to cardiac stretch, whereas in HFpEF, biomarker interactions were mostly related to inflammation. In HFmrEF, biomarker interactions were both related to inflammation and cardiac stretch. In HFpEF and HFmrEF (but not in HFrEF), remodeling markers at admission and changes in levels of inflammatory markers across the first 24 h were predictive for all-cause mortality and rehospitalization at 60 days (pinteraction <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker profiles in patients with acute HFrEF were mainly related to cardiac stretch and in HFpEF related to inflammation. Patients with HFmrEF showed an intermediate biomarker profile with biomarker interactions between both cardiac stretch and inflammation markers. (PROTECT-1: A Study of the Selective A1 Adenosine Receptor Antagonist KW-3902 for Patients Hospitalized With Acute HF and Volume Overload to Assess Treatment Effect on Congestion and Renal Function; NCT00328692).
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HFpEF; HFrEF; acute heart failure; biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28624483     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  27 in total

1.  Relationship of ejection fraction and natriuretic peptide trajectories in heart failure with baseline reduced and mid-range ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Patrick Stafford; Olusola Laja; Comfort Elumogo; Persey Bediako; Nora Tolbert; Douglas Sawch; Sthuthi David; Nishtha Sodhi; Anita Barber; Younghoon Kwon; Nishaki Mehta; Brandy Patterson; Khadijah Breathett; Sula Mazimba
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Proteomic Signatures of Heart Failure in Relation to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Luigi Adamo; Jinsheng Yu; Cibele Rocha-Resende; Ali Javaheri; Richard D Head; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Multiple Plasma Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Alena Orlenko; Lei Zhao; Michael D Basso; Mary Ellen Cvijic; Zhuyin Li; Thomas E Spires; Melissa Yarde; Zhaoqing Wang; Dietmar A Seiffert; Stuart Prenner; Payman Zamani; Priyanka Bhattacharya; Anupam Kumar; Kenneth B Margulies; Bruce D Car; David A Gordon; Jason H Moore; Thomas P Cappola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Heart Failure with Recovered EF and Heart Failure with Mid-Range EF: Current Recommendations and Controversies.

Authors:  Peter Unkovic; Anupam Basuray
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 5.  Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction and How to Treat It.

Authors:  Yuri Lopatin
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2018-05

Review 6.  Congestion occurrence and evaluation in acute heart failure scenario: time to reconsider different pathways of volume overload.

Authors:  Alberto Palazzuoli; Isabella Evangelista; Ranuccio Nuti
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Pratyaksh K Srivastava; Jeffrey J Hsu; Boback Ziaeian; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-02

8.  Heart Failure Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Paula Felippe Martinez; Marina Politi Okoshi; Katashi Okoshi; Silvio Assis de Oliveira-Junior
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Rationale for the Use of Pirfenidone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Francesca Graziani; Rosa Lillo; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 10.  Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes.

Authors:  Alberto Palazzuoli; Matteo Beltrami
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.