Literature DB >> 28623665

Position paper on olfactory dysfunction.

T Hummel1, K L Whitcroft1, P Andrews2, A Altundag3, C Cinghi4, R M Costanzo5, M Damm6, J Frasnelli7, H Gudziol8, N Gupta9, A Haehner1, E Holbrook10, S C Hong11, D Hornung12, K B Hüttenbrink12, R Kamel13, M Kobayashi14, I Konstantinidis15, B N Landis16, D A Leopold17, A Macchi18, T Miwa19, R Moesges20, J Mullol21, C A Mueller22, G Ottaviano23, G C Passali24, C Philpott25, J M Pinto26, V J Ramakrishnan27, P Rombaux28, Y Roth29, R A Schlosser30, B Shu31, G Soler32, P Stjärne33, B A Stuck34, J Vodicka35, A Welge-Luessen36.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: - Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. - Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. - Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. - Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. - Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.
CONCLUSIONS: We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28623665     DOI: 10.4193/Rhino16.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  46 in total

1.  Prognostic value of olfactory evoked potentials in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction.

Authors:  Yichen Guo; Dawei Wu; Zhifu Sun; Linyin Yao; Jia Liu; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Pleasantness of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants in different Italian regions.

Authors:  Elena Cantone; Andrea Ciofalo; Jan Vodicka; Valentina Iacono; Ioannis Mylonakis; Bruno Scarpa; Massimiliano Russo; Maurizio Iengo; Marco de Vincentiis; Alessandro Martini; Giancarlo Ottaviano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Altered glucose metabolism of the olfactory-related cortices in anosmia patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Dawei Wu; Xiang Li; Baihan Su; Zhifu Sun; Binbin Nie; Xiaoli Zhang; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food.

Authors:  Y Zang; P Han; S Burghardt; A Knaapila; V Schriever; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Guideline S1: Long COVID: Diagnostics and treatment strategies].

Authors:  Susanne Rabady; Johann Altenberger; Markus Brose; Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert; Elisabeth Fertl; Florian Götzinger; Maria de la Cruz Gomez Pellin; Benedikt Hofbaur; Kathryn Hoffmann; Renate Hoffmann-Dorninger; Rembert Koczulla; Oliver Lammel; Bernd Lamprecht; Judith Löffler-Ragg; Christian A Müller; Stefanie Poggenburg; Hans Rittmannsberger; Paul Sator; Volker Strenger; Karin Vonbank; Johannes Wancata; Thomas Weber; Jörg Weber; Günter Weiss; Maria Wendler; Ralf-Harun Zwick
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Treatment strategies for postviral olfactory dysfunction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel N Helman; Jonah Adler; Aria Jafari; Sasha Bennett; Jackson R Vuncannon; Ashley C Cozart; Sarah K Wise; Merin E Kuruvilla; Joshua M Levy
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.587

7.  Impaired brain response to odors in patients with varied severity of olfactory loss after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Pengfei Han; Nicole Winkler; Cornelia Hummel; Antje Hähner; Johannes Gerber; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Oral and Nasal Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction: A European Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Sven Saussez; Luigi Angelo Vaira; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Serge-D Le Bon; Mihaela Horoi; Giovanna Deiana; Marzia Petrocelli; Philippe Boelpaep; Giovanni Salzano; Mohamad Khalife; Stephane Hans; Giacomo De Riu; Claire Hopkins; Jerome R Lechien
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  Smell and taste in idiopathic blepharospasm.

Authors:  Julie Gamain; Thorsten Herr; Robert Fleischmann; Andrea Stenner; Marcus Vollmer; Carsten Willert; Birgitt Veit; Bernhard Lehnert; Jan-Uwe Mueller; Frank Steigerwald; Frank Tost; Martin Kronenbuerger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Exposure to Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Anosmia.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhang; Nicholas R Rowan; Jayant M Pinto; Nyall R London; Andrew P Lane; Shyam Biswal; Murugappan Ramanathan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.