Literature DB >> 28623421

Comparison of dual-energy CT, ultrasound and surface measurement for assessing tophus dissolution during rapid urate debulking.

Dodji V Modjinou1,2,3, Svetlana Krasnokutsky1,2, Soterios Gyftopoulos1,4, Virginia C Pike1,2, Elaine Karis1,2, Robert T Keenan1,2,5, Kristen Lee1,2, Daria B Crittenden1,2, Jonathan Samuels1,2, Michael H Pillinger6,7,8.   

Abstract

Tophaceous gout is painful and impairs quality of life. The optimal modality for assessing tophus resolution in response to urate-lowering treatment remains poorly defined. Using pegloticase as a model system for resolving tophi, we compared multiple imaging and physical diagnostic strategies for assessing tophus resolution. A 32-year-old subject with chronic refractory tophaceous gout was enrolled and received 6 months of pegloticase treatment. Measurements of tophi using vernier calipers (monthly), photographs and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US; every 3 months), and dual-energy CT (DECT) were compared. Pegloticase persistently lowered the patient's sUA to <0.5 mg/dl. After 6 months, caliper measurements revealed 73, 60, and 61% reductions of three index tophi, while MSK-US revealed 47, 65, and 48% reductions. In contrast, DECT revealed 100% resolution of monosodium urate deposition in all three index tophi, and resolution or improvement of all other tophi identified. On caliper and MSK-US measurement, index tophus size fluctuated, with some lesions enlarging before ultimately contracting. Correlation between assessment modalities during tophus resolution may be poor. DECT identifies urate deposits invisible to physical exam and reveals that some urate deposits completely resolve even as their physically/sonographically measurable lesions persist. Recognition of urate resorption during the urate-lowering process may be confounded by fluctuating lesion volumes during initial tophus breakdown. While DECT was superior for identifying total (including occult) urate deposition, and assessing volume of deposits, other modalities may permit better assessment of non-urate tophus components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy CT; Gout; Pegloticase; Ultrasound; Uric acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28623421     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3729-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  25 in total

1.  Reproducibility of musculoskeletal ultrasound for determining monosodium urate deposition: concordance between readers.

Authors:  Rennie G Howard; Michael H Pillinger; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Ralf G Thiele; Christopher J Swearingen; Jonathan Samuels
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Methods of tophus assessment in clinical trials of chronic gout: a systematic literature review and pictorial reference guide.

Authors:  Nicola Dalbeth; Cameron Schauer; Patricia Macdonald; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; H Ralph Schumacher; Steve Hamburger; Hyon K Choi; Fiona M McQueen; Anthony Doyle; William J Taylor
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  John S Sundy; Herbert S B Baraf; Robert A Yood; N Lawrence Edwards; Sergio R Gutierrez-Urena; Edward L Treadwell; Janitzia Vázquez-Mellado; William B White; Peter E Lipsky; Zeb Horowitz; William Huang; Allan N Maroli; Royce W Waltrip; Steven A Hamburger; Michael A Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  New therapies for gout.

Authors:  Daria B Crittenden; Michael H Pillinger
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.739

5.  Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout.

Authors:  Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Marcelo Calabozo; Jose I Pijoan; Ana M Herrero-Beites; Ana Ruibal
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-08

6.  A world of hurt: failure to achieve treatment goals in patients with gout requires a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Puja Khanna; Dinesh Khanna; Chris Storgard; Scott Baumgartner; Robert Morlock
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  [Dual energy CT--a new perspective in the diagnosis of gout].

Authors:  A Artmann; M Ratzenböck; I Noszian; K Trieb
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-10-27

8.  Ultrasonographic measurement of tophi as an outcome measure for chronic gout.

Authors:  Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Iñaki Martin; Begoña Canteli
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Quality of life and disability in patients with treatment-failure gout.

Authors:  Michael A Becker; H Ralph Schumacher; Katy L Benjamin; Peter Gorevic; Maria Greenwald; Jeffrey Fessel; Lawrence Edwards; Ariane K Kawata; Lori Frank; Royce Waltrip; Allan Maroli; Bill Huang; John S Sundy
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Tophus burden reduction with pegloticase: results from phase 3 randomized trials and open-label extension in patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy.

Authors:  Herbert S B Baraf; Michael A Becker; Sergio R Gutierrez-Urena; Edward L Treadwell; Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado; Claudia D Rehrig; Faith D Ottery; John S Sundy; Robert A Yood
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Gout: Update on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography with Emphasis on Artifact Identification.

Authors:  Hillary W Garner; Daniel E Wessell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Pegloticase in gout treatment - safety issues, latest evidence and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Allison Guttmann; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Michael H Pillinger; Adey Berhanu
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-09-13

Review 3.  Current status of ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography in the evaluation of gout.

Authors:  Hillary W Garner; Daniel E Wessell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Assessment of cardiovascular risk profile based on measurement of tophus volume in patients with gout.

Authors:  Kyung-Ann Lee; Se-Ri Ryu; Seong-Jun Park; Hae-Rim Kim; Sang-Heon Lee
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Development and validation of a quantitative method for estimation of the urate burden in patients with gouty arthritis using dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Maximilian Kotlyarov; Kay Geert A Hermann; Jürgen Mews; Bernd Hamm; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Gout of hand and wrist: the value of US as compared with DECT.

Authors:  Andrea S Klauser; Ethan J Halpern; Sylvia Strobl; Mohamed M H Abd Ellah; Johann Gruber; Rosa Bellmann-Weiler; Thomas Auer; Gudrun Feuchtner; Werner Jaschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography: impact for the detection of gouty deposits.

Authors:  Christoph Schwabl; Mihra Taljanovic; Gerlig Widmann; James Teh; Andrea S Klauser
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-10-02

Review 8.  The Role of Advanced Imaging in Gout Management.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Li; Guanhua Xu; Junyu Liang; Liyan Wan; Heng Cao; Jin Lin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Prevalence and Risk Factors for Peripheral Neuropathy in Chinese Patients With Gout.

Authors:  Kaifeng Guo; Nan Liang; Mian Wu; Lihui Chen; Haibing Chen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Tophus resolution in patients with chronic refractory gout who have persistent urate-lowering responses to pegloticase.

Authors:  Brian F Mandell; Anthony E Yeo; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.