PURPOSE: To describe the first experience with dual energy CT (DECT) for the diagnosis of gout and to evaluate its potential for the clinical routine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DECT examinations acquired with a dual source CT of 71 regions from 41 patients were evaluated with respect to image quality, amount of urate deposits and their location. The amount of urate deposits was described using a 4-stage scale: none (1), minimal punctual (up to 2 mm) (2), at least moderate (bigger than 2 mm) (3), soft tissue or osseus tophi (4). The DECT results were compared with the findings of the diagnostic tools currently in use. RESULTS: The DECTs of peripheral regions showed excellent image quality, while the image quality was poor in the regions of the trunk. Patients (n) and regions (r) with a score of 3 (n = 23, r = 44), 4 (n = 5, r = 8) and 1 (n = 2, r = 2) showed a highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) with the currently available diagnostic tools. In patients or regions with a score of 2 (n = 7, r = 11), the urate deposits were asymptomatic, the serum urate levels were partly elevated (43 %) and partly normal (57 %). The symptoms were ultimately able to be associated with a differential diagnosis. The urate deposits were found in tendons (57), articular synovia (25), cartilage (17), soft tissue tophi (8), osseus tophi (5), cruciate ligaments (7) and menisci (7). CONCLUSION: DECT allows specific and quantitative visualization of urate deposits in peripheral regions. Taking into account the amount of urate deposits shown in DECT, the diagnosis of gout can be stated reliably. Based on our experience and results, DECT greatly benefits the routine diagnosis of gout in peripheral regions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.
PURPOSE: To describe the first experience with dual energy CT (DECT) for the diagnosis of gout and to evaluate its potential for the clinical routine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DECT examinations acquired with a dual source CT of 71 regions from 41 patients were evaluated with respect to image quality, amount of urate deposits and their location. The amount of urate deposits was described using a 4-stage scale: none (1), minimal punctual (up to 2 mm) (2), at least moderate (bigger than 2 mm) (3), soft tissue or osseus tophi (4). The DECT results were compared with the findings of the diagnostic tools currently in use. RESULTS: The DECTs of peripheral regions showed excellent image quality, while the image quality was poor in the regions of the trunk. Patients (n) and regions (r) with a score of 3 (n = 23, r = 44), 4 (n = 5, r = 8) and 1 (n = 2, r = 2) showed a highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) with the currently available diagnostic tools. In patients or regions with a score of 2 (n = 7, r = 11), the urate deposits were asymptomatic, the serum urate levels were partly elevated (43 %) and partly normal (57 %). The symptoms were ultimately able to be associated with a differential diagnosis. The urate deposits were found in tendons (57), articular synovia (25), cartilage (17), soft tissue tophi (8), osseus tophi (5), cruciate ligaments (7) and menisci (7). CONCLUSION: DECT allows specific and quantitative visualization of urate deposits in peripheral regions. Taking into account the amount of urate deposits shown in DECT, the diagnosis of gout can be stated reliably. Based on our experience and results, DECT greatly benefits the routine diagnosis of gout in peripheral regions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.
Authors: Dodji V Modjinou; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Virginia C Pike; Elaine Karis; Robert T Keenan; Kristen Lee; Daria B Crittenden; Jonathan Samuels; Michael H Pillinger Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 2.980