Literature DB >> 28622184

Does Age Influence the Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix Enriched with Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate in Lumbar Fusions?

Remi M Ajiboye1, Mark A Eckardt1, Jason T Hamamoto1, Akshay Sharma2, Adam Z Khan1, Jeffrey C Wang3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of age on the efficacy of allograft/demineralized bone matrix (DBM) enriched with concentrated bone marrow aspirate (BMA) in posterolateral lumbar fusions (PLFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cell-based therapies such as concentrated BMA have been developed as a potential alternative to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). BMA contains mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and growth factors that can confer osteogenic and osteoinductive potential to osteoconductive scaffolds such as DBM/allograft. To date, no studies have examined the role of age on fusion outcomes when BMA is utilized despite the well-established deleterious effects of advanced age on bone marrow and MSC potential.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients that underwent PLF were divided into 3 groups. Group A (n=14) composed of patients age 65 years and older who received BMA with DBM. Group B (n=17) consisted of patients younger than 65 years of age who received BMA with DBM. Group C (n=20) composed of patients age 65 years and older who received ICBG. Fusion rates and clinical outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Fusion was significantly lower in group A (35.7%) compared with both groups B (76.4%) and C (80%) (A vs. B, P=0.03; A vs. C, P=0.01). There were no differences in clinical outcomes among all groups except for pseudarthrosis which occurred in 28.6% of patients in group A compared with none and 5% of patients in groups B and C, respectively (A vs. B, P=0.03; A vs. C, P=0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients undergoing PLF using DBM enriched with BMA achieved lower radiographic fusion success compared with their nonelderly counterparts and compared with elderly patients that had fusion with ICBG. This may be partly due to the effect of advanced age on MSC potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28622184     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  6 in total

1.  Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Morris; Sandip P Tarpada; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical and CT Analysis of Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: β-Tricalcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix.

Authors:  Pedro Hoffiz Ricart; Sapan D Gandhi; Jonathon Geisinger; Kevin Baker; Daniel K Park
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-09-12

3.  Safety and Tolerability of Stromal Vascular Fraction Combined with β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Phase I Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Un Yong Choi; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Sang Heon Lim; Young Jae Kim; Seil Sohn; Seung Hun Sheen; Chan Yeong Heo; Inbo Han
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Dong-Gune Chang; Jong-Beom Park; Yangjun Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Bone Marrow Aspirate in Spine Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Hesham Zakaria; Lara Massie; Christian T Ogasawara; Gunnar A Lee; Mokbel Chedid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-09

6.  Use of Autologous Stem Cells in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Patrick Hsieh; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; Darrel S Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.