| Literature DB >> 28620752 |
Tomas Lapinskas1,2,3, Bernhard Schnackenburg4, Marc Kouwenhoven5, Rolf Gebker6,7, Alexander Berger6, Remigijus Zaliunas8, Burkert Pieske6,7, Sebastian Kelle6,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the advantages of recently developed cardiac imaging techniques of fat-water separation and feature tracking to characterize better individuals with chronic myocardial infarction (MI).Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Chronic myocardial infarction; Fatty metaplasia; Fat–water separated imaging; Feature tracking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28620752 PMCID: PMC5813049 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-017-0639-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAGMA ISSN: 0968-5243 Impact factor: 2.310
Fig. 1Example of patient with history of two chronic MI. Conventional LGE (a), in-phase (b), fat-only (c), and water-only (d) mDixon images acquired in ventricular four-chamber view. LGE, in-phase and water-only mDixon images demonstrate scar tissue in the medial inferoseptal and medial anterolateral segments (arrows). Fat deposition is visible in fat-only image in corresponding myocardial segments (arrows). MI myocardial infarction, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, mDixon multiecho inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo
Fig. 2The left column three images are from a patient with chronic transmural MI without fat deposition: fat-only (a), water-only (b), and in-phase (c) mDixon images acquired in ventricular three-chamber view. Water-only and in-phase mDixon images demonstrate transmural scar (arrows) in the medial anteroseptal, apical septal and lateral segments as well as apical cap. However, despite transmural extent of scar tissue fat-only mDixon image did not show fat accumulation. The right column three images in short-axis orientation are from patient with subendocardial scar and fat deposition: Fat-only (d) mDixon image shows fatty metaplasia in the medial inferolateral segment. Scar tissue is nicely depicted in water-only (e) and in-phase (f) mDixon images. MI myocardial infarction; mDixon multiecho inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo
Subject characteristics
| Fat deposition absent group ( | Fat deposition present group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age (years) | 64.40 ± 9.34 | 58.00 ± 10.41 | 0.165 |
| Male gender | 9 (90%) | 9 (90%) | 1.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.84 ± 2.81 | 28.16 ± 3.37 | 0.822 |
| BSA (m2) | 2.02 ± 0.18 | 2.09 ± 0.16 | 0.387 |
| Infarct age (months) | 15.0 [8.5–91.0] | 72.0 [51.0–145.5] | 0.143 |
| Volumetric and functional parameters | |||
| LV EDV (mL) | 175.75 ± 33.42 | 166.70 ± 37.92 | 0.578 |
| LV EDV index (ml/m2) | 86.85 ± 14.39 | 80.78 ± 23.12 | 0.492 |
| LV ESV (mL) | 80.40 ± 24.64 | 85.10 ± 29.32 | 0.703 |
| LV ESV index (ml/m2) | 39.74 ± 11.83 | 41.39 ± 16.87 | 0.803 |
| LV EF (%) | 55.07 ± 8.90 | 49.86 ± 7.20 | 0.168 |
| LV mass (g) | 113.14 ± 21.51 | 105.70 ± 16.27 | 0.396 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 55.77 ± 8.54 | 50.56 ± 6.62 | 0.146 |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 6.57 ± 1.23 | 5.71 ± 1.06 | 0.112 |
| Cardiac index (L/min/m2) | 3.24 ± 0.51 | 2.73 ± 0.44 | 0.029 |
Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation, total number (percentage), or median [interquartile rage]
BMI body mass index, BSA body surface area, LV left ventricle/ventricular, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EF ejection fraction
Comparison of myocardial tissue characterization between study subjects
| Fat deposition absent group ( | Fat deposition present group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global LGE (fibrosis + fat) | |||
| Mass (g) | 11.23 ± 6.01 | 19.12 ± 7.48 | 0.019 |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 9.88 ± 4.37 | 17.77 ± 5.49 | 0.004 |
| Fibrosis | |||
| Mass (g) | 11.23 ± 6.01 | 12.46 ± 6.99 | 0.796 |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 9.88 ± 4.37 | 11.49 ± 5.82 | 0.529 |
| Fat deposition | |||
| Mass (g) | 0.00 | 5.17 ± 2.61 | – |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 0.00 | 4.83 ± 2.33 | – |
| Ratio of LGE mass (%) | 0.00 | 27.30 ± 9.96 | – |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LVM left ventricular mass
Fig. 3The infarct size estimated in conventional LGE images is similar to that calculated in mDixon images. LGE late gadolinium enhancement, mDixon multiecho inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo
Comparison of myocardial tissue characteristics parameters between two methods
| 3D T1 Inversion recovery ( | 3D In-phase (mDixon) ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global LGE | |||
| Mass (g) | 15.17 ± 7.75 | 15.58 ± 8.59 | 0.807 |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 13.83 ± 6.30 | 14.15 ± 6.97 | 0.807 |
| Fibrosis | |||
| Mass (g) | 15.17 ± 7.75 | 12.99 ± 7.68 | 0.101 |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 13.83 ± 6.30 | 10.68 ± 5.07 | 0.005 |
| Fat deposition | |||
| Mass (g) | 0.00 | 5.17 ± 2.61 | – |
| Ratio of LVM (%) | 0.00 | 4.83 ± 2.33 | – |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Fat deposition mass and fat deposition as percentage of myocardial mass were calculated only in patients with fat deposition (n = 10)
3D three dimensional, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LVM left ventricular mass
Fig. 4Comparison of LV circumferential (a) and radial (b) strain between segments of remote myocardium and segments containing fibrosis only or fibrosis and fat tissue. The EccLV and ErrLV values were significantly higher in segments of remote myocardium than in segments containing fibrosis only or fibrosis and fat. There was no significant difference in strain parameters between segments containing fibrosis only and fibrosis and fat. LV left ventricular, Ecc left ventricular circumferential strain, Err left ventricular radial strain. Dotted lines correspond normal values of myocardial strain measurements derived using CMR feature tracking [36]
Fig. 5Comparison of LV circumferential (a) and radial (b) strain values between myocardial segments adjacent to fibrosis and fat deposition and segments adjacent to fibrosis only. The EccLV and ErrLV strain values were significantly higher in myocardial segments adjacent to segments containing fibrosis and fat tissue. LV left ventricular, Ecc left ventricular circumferential strain, Err left ventricular radial strain. Dotted lines correspond normal values of myocardial strain measurements derived using CMR feature tracking [36]
Fig. 6Practical schematic of proposed imaging protocol for patients with chronic MI to characterize myocardial tissue. Imaging protocol could be started with scouts to determine cardiac imaging planes following immediate gadolinium injection. After administration of contrast agent cine images could be acquired in three long-axis and stack of short-axis orientations. Functional imaging can be done in 10 min after which tissue characterization using fat–water separated imaging could be started. As 3D mDixon imaging ensures detailed tissue characterization this technique would be sufficient to complete myocardial viability protocol. MI myocardial infarction