Literature DB >> 22634740

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis: an equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Andrew S Flett1, Daniel M Sado, Giovanni Quarta, Mariana Mirabel, Denis Pellerin, Anna S Herrey, Derek J Hausenloy, Cono Ariti, John Yap, Shyam Kolvekar, Andrew M Taylor, James C Moon.   

Abstract

AIMS: Haemodynamics alone do not fully explain symptoms and prognosis in clinically severe aortic stenosis (AS). Myocardial disease, specifically diffuse myocardial fibrosis (DMF), may contribute. We used equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EQ-CMR) and sought to non-invasively measure DMF in severe AS and determine its clinical significance before and after valve replacement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), 6 min walk test (6MWT), and EQ-CMR pre- (n = 63) at baseline and at 6 months post- (n = 42) aortic valve replacement (AVR). EQ-CMR was also performed in 30 normal controls. Baseline: patients with AS had more DMF than controls (18 vs. 13%, P = 0.007) with a wide range (5-38%) that overlapped controls. The extent of diffuse fibrosis correlated inversely with the 6MWT performance (r(2) = 0.22, P = 0.001). Those with severe diastolic dysfunction had more DMF (P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the predictors of performance at 6MWT were diffuse fibrosis and BNP (P = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively). Post-op: following valve replacement, morphological and functional parameters improved [6 MWT, LA area, BNP, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and volumes]. LV hypertrophy regression was shown to be cell volume reduction (P < 0.001) and not fibrosis regression (P = 0.54). Of the five deaths over six-month follow-up, four occurred in patients in the highest tertile of DMF.
CONCLUSION: DMF as measured by EQ-CMR is elevated in severe AS vs. normal controls but with a considerable overlap. It correlates with functional capacity at baseline. LV hypertrophy regression 6 months after AVR is cellular rather than fibrosis resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634740     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  62 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular hypertrophy: The relationship between the electrocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ljuba Bacharova; Martin Ugander
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Clinical and research applications of simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI.

Authors:  F Fraioli; S Punwani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study of long-term and incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Richard B Thompson; Paolo Raggi; Natasha Wiebe; Martin Ugander; Jannike Nickander; Scott W Klarenbach; Stephanie Thompson; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 4.  Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.

Authors:  Gianluca De Rubeis; Nicola Galea; Isabella Ceravolo; Gian Marco Dacquino; Iacopo Carbone; Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Cardiac T(1) imaging.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02

Review 6.  Imaging for assessment of sudden death risk: current role and future prospects.

Authors:  Takeki Suzuki; Saman Nazarian; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a reliable alternative to cardiovascular computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annulus valve sizing.

Authors:  Riccardo Faletti; Marco Gatti; Stefano Salizzoni; Laura Bergamasco; Rodolfo Bonamini; Domenica Garabello; Walter Grosso Marra; Michele La Torre; Mara Morello; Simona Veglia; Paolo Fonio; Mauro Rinaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  4D flow MRI, cardiac function, and T1 -mapping: Association of valve-mediated changes in aortic hemodynamics with left ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Julia Geiger; Amir A Rahsepar; Kenichiro Suwa; Alex Powell; Ahmadreza Ghasemiesfe; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Role of cardiac MRI in diabetes.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Myocardial extracellular volume expansion and the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Tomas G Neilan; Francois-Pierre Mongeon; Ravi V Shah; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Siddique A Abbasi; John A Dodson; Ciaran J McMullan; Bobak Heydari; Gregory F Michaud; Roy M John; Ron Blankstein; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.