Literature DB >> 2861880

MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.

.   

Abstract

The main aim of the trial was to determine whether drug treatment of mild hypertension (phase V diastolic pressure 90-109 mm Hg) reduced the rates of stroke, of death due to hypertension, and of coronary events in men and women aged 35-64 years. Subsidiary aims were: to compare the course of blood pressure in two groups, one taking bendrofluazide and one taking propranolol, and to compare the incidence of suspected adverse reactions to these two drugs. The study was single blind and based almost entirely in general practices; 17 354 patients were recruited, and 85 572 patient years of observation have accrued. Patients were randomly allocated at entry to take bendrofluazide or propranolol or placebo tablets. The primary results were as follows. The stroke rate was reduced on active treatment: 60 strokes occurred in the treated group and 109 in the placebo group, giving rates of 1.4 and 2.6 per 1000 patient years of observation respectively (p less than 0.01 on sequential analysis). Treatment made no difference, however, to the overall rates of coronary events: 222 events occurred on active treatment and 234 in the placebo group (5.2 and 5.5 per 1000 patient years respectively). The incidence of all cardiovascular events was reduced on active treatment: 286 events occurred in the treated group and 352 in the placebo group, giving rates of 6.7 and 8.2 per 1000 patient years respectively (p less than 0.05 on sequential analysis). For mortality from all causes treatment made no difference to the rates. There were 248 deaths in the treated group and 253 in the placebo group (rates 5.8 and 5.9 per 1000 patient years respectively). Several post hoc analyses of subgroup results were also performed but they require very cautious interpretation. The all cause mortality was reduced in men on active treatment (157 deaths versus 181 in the placebo group; 7.1 and 8.2 per 1000 patient years respectively) but increased in women on active treatment (91 deaths versus 72; 4.4 and 3.5 per 1000 patient years respectively). The difference between the sexes in their response to treatment was significant (p = 0.05). Comparison of the two active drugs showed that the reduction in stroke rate on bendrofluazide was greater than that on propranolol (p = 0.002). The stroke rate was reduced in both smokers and non-smokers taking bendrofluazide but only in non-smokers taking propranolol. This difference between the responses to the two drugs was significant (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2861880      PMCID: PMC1416260          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6488.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  10 in total

1.  A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS.

Authors:  G A ROSE; W W HOLLAND; E A CROWLEY
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  THE ROLE OF BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL IN PREVENTING COMPLICATIONS OF HYPERTENSION.

Authors:  M HAMILTON; E M THOMPSON; T K WISNIEWSKI
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Hypotensive therapy in stroke survivors.

Authors:  A B Carter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  B M Wright; C F Dore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Conflicting clinical trials and the uncertainty of treating mild hypertension.

Authors:  P J Toth; R I Horwitz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Annual meeting of the British Hypertension Society. Oxford, UK, 25th-26th September 1984.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Current issues in the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Authors:  S J Pocock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-01-05

8.  Screening for hypertension: some epidemiological observations.

Authors:  W E Miall; S Chinn
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-09-07

9.  Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study.

Authors:  K Aho; P Harmsen; S Hatano; J Marquardsen; V E Smirnov; T Strasser
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Management of the hypertensive patient: a continuing dilemma.

Authors:  M H Alderman; S Madhavan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.190

  10 in total
  266 in total

1.  Osteoporosis is a risk factor, not a disease.

Authors:  K E Pearce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

2.  Isolated systolic hypertension: a radical rethink. It's a risk factor that needs treatment, especially in the over 50s.

Authors:  I B Wilkinson; D J Webb Christison; J R Cockcroft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

Review 3.  Prospectively designed overviews of recent trials comparing antihypertensive regimens based on different drug classes.

Authors:  N Chapman; B Neal
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Why beta-blockers are not cardioprotective in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Ehud Grossman; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 2: Beta-blockers.

Authors:  J M Wright
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Resistant hypertension and the Birmingham Hypertension Square.

Authors:  D C Felmeden; G Y Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Financial and health costs of uncontrolled blood pressure in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Adam Lloyd; Claudia Schmieder; Nick Marchant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Drug treatment of hypertension complicating diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M J MacLeod; J McLay
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Management of the hypertensive patient who smokes.

Authors:  H Pardell; R Tresserras; E Saltó; P Armario; R Hernández
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.