Literature DB >> 28618584

Model of the best-of-N nest-site selection process in honeybees.

Andreagiovanni Reina1, James A R Marshall1, Vito Trianni2, Thomas Bose1.   

Abstract

The ability of a honeybee swarm to select the best nest site plays a fundamental role in determining the future colony's fitness. To date, the nest-site selection process has mostly been modeled and theoretically analyzed for the case of binary decisions. However, when the number of alternative nests is larger than two, the decision-process dynamics qualitatively change. In this work, we extend previous analyses of a value-sensitive decision-making mechanism to a decision process among N nests. First, we present the decision-making dynamics in the symmetric case of N equal-quality nests. Then, we generalize our findings to a best-of-N decision scenario with one superior nest and N-1 inferior nests, previously studied empirically in bees and ants. Whereas previous binary models highlighted the crucial role of inhibitory stop-signaling, the key parameter in our new analysis is the relative time invested by swarm members in individual discovery and in signaling behaviors. Our new analysis reveals conflicting pressures on this ratio in symmetric and best-of-N decisions, which could be solved through a time-dependent signaling strategy. Additionally, our analysis suggests how ecological factors determining the density of suitable nest sites may have led to selective pressures for an optimal stable signaling ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28618584     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E        ISSN: 2470-0045            Impact factor:   2.529


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scale invariance in natural and artificial collective systems: a review.

Authors:  Yara Khaluf; Eliseo Ferrante; Pieter Simoens; Cristián Huepe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Negative feedback may suppress variation to improve collective foraging performance.

Authors:  Andreagiovanni Reina; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Psychophysical Laws and the Superorganism.

Authors:  Andreagiovanni Reina; Thomas Bose; Vito Trianni; James A R Marshall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Neglected Pieces of Designing Collective Decision-Making Processes.

Authors:  Yara Khaluf; Pieter Simoens; Heiko Hamann
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making.

Authors:  Angelo Pirrone; Wen Wen; Sheng Li
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.288

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.