Literature DB >> 28617621

The ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for novel oncology drugs: correspondence with three years of reimbursement decisions in Israel.

Ariel Hammerman1, Sari Greenberg-Dotan1, Ilan Feldhamer1, Yair Birnbaum1, Nathan I Cherny2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology published in 2015 its Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for cancer medicines. Our objective was to evaluate the association between Israel's national reimbursement decisions regarding novel cancer drugs, prior to the availability of ESMO-MCBS, and the later published ESMO-MCBS scores. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ESMO-MCBS scores were obtained retrospectively for the cancer drugs that were candidates for reimbursement in Israel in 2013-2015 and were categorized to 'highest benefit' (ESMO-MCBS 4-5 or A) 'medium benefit' (3 or B) and 'lowest benefit' (0-2 or C). The reimbursement decisions were accessed and compared with the categorized ESMO scores.
RESULTS: ESMO-MCBS score was available for 19/22 drugs approved for reimbursement and 15/16 non-approved drugs. 58% of the approved drugs gained a 'highest benefit' score and 37% were 'medium benefit'. 87% of the non-approved drugs had 'lowest benefit' scores. Median score for approved drugs was 4 vs. 1 for the non-approved (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The Israeli decisions regarding reimbursement of novel cancer drugs, demonstrated concordance with ESMO-MCBS scores. Incorporation of ESMO-MCBS data in reimbursement deliberations could assist in framing the appropriate use of the limited resources to deliver effective and affordable cancer care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer drugs; ESMO; National Health Insurance; reimbursement decisions; value framework

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617621     DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1343146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  8 in total

1.  Immunotherapies for advanced melanoma: as promising as they are expensive?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Access to Novel Drugs for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Central and Southeastern Europe: A Central European Cooperative Oncology Group Analysis.

Authors:  Tanja Cufer; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Peter Berzinec; Gabriela Galffy; Marko Jakopovic; Jacek Jassem; Dragana Jovanovic; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Gyula Ostoros; Christiane Thallinger; Milada Zemanova; Christoph Zielinski
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 3.  Breast Cancer: Reimbursement Policies and Adoption of New Therapeutic Agents by National Health Systems.

Authors:  Dario Trapani; Giuseppe Curigliano; Alexandru Eniu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Measuring Clinical Benefit of Treatments for Hematologic Malignancies: Critical First Steps Accomplished-What is Next?

Authors:  John G Gribben; Elisabeth de Vries; Nathan I Cherny; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2020-04-01

5.  Access to Novel Drugs for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Central and Southeastern Europe: A Central European Cooperative Oncology Group Analysis.

Authors:  Tanja Cufer; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Peter Berzinec; Gabriela Galffy; Marko Jakopovic; Jacek Jassem; Dragana Jovanovic; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Gyula Ostoros; Christiane Thallinger; Milada Zemanova; Christoph Zielinski
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 6.  Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Dario Trapani; Kiu Tay-Teo; Megan E Tesch; Felipe Roitberg; Manju Sengar; Sara C Altuna; Michael J Hassett; Armando A Genazzani; Aaron S Kesselheim; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Patients' and oncologists' perceptions towards the discussion on high-cost innovative cancer therapies: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Osnat Bashkin; Keren Dopelt; Noam Asna
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Barbara Kiesewetter; Nathan I Cherny; Nicolas Boissel; Francesco Cerisoli; Urania Dafni; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Paolo Ghia; Nicola Gökbuget; Verónica González-Calle; Brian Huntly; Ulrich Jäger; Nicola Jane Latino; Jean-Yves Douillard; Luca Malcovati; María-Victoria Mateos; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Kimmo Porkka; Markus Raderer; Josep-Maria Ribera; Lydia Scarfò; Ruth Wester; Panagiota Zygoura; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.