BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology published in 2015 its Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for cancer medicines. Our objective was to evaluate the association between Israel's national reimbursement decisions regarding novel cancer drugs, prior to the availability of ESMO-MCBS, and the later published ESMO-MCBS scores. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ESMO-MCBS scores were obtained retrospectively for the cancer drugs that were candidates for reimbursement in Israel in 2013-2015 and were categorized to 'highest benefit' (ESMO-MCBS 4-5 or A) 'medium benefit' (3 or B) and 'lowest benefit' (0-2 or C). The reimbursement decisions were accessed and compared with the categorized ESMO scores. RESULTS: ESMO-MCBS score was available for 19/22 drugs approved for reimbursement and 15/16 non-approved drugs. 58% of the approved drugs gained a 'highest benefit' score and 37% were 'medium benefit'. 87% of the non-approved drugs had 'lowest benefit' scores. Median score for approved drugs was 4 vs. 1 for the non-approved (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Israeli decisions regarding reimbursement of novel cancer drugs, demonstrated concordance with ESMO-MCBS scores. Incorporation of ESMO-MCBS data in reimbursement deliberations could assist in framing the appropriate use of the limited resources to deliver effective and affordable cancer care.
BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology published in 2015 its Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for cancer medicines. Our objective was to evaluate the association between Israel's national reimbursement decisions regarding novel cancer drugs, prior to the availability of ESMO-MCBS, and the later published ESMO-MCBS scores. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ESMO-MCBS scores were obtained retrospectively for the cancer drugs that were candidates for reimbursement in Israel in 2013-2015 and were categorized to 'highest benefit' (ESMO-MCBS 4-5 or A) 'medium benefit' (3 or B) and 'lowest benefit' (0-2 or C). The reimbursement decisions were accessed and compared with the categorized ESMO scores. RESULTS:ESMO-MCBS score was available for 19/22 drugs approved for reimbursement and 15/16 non-approved drugs. 58% of the approved drugs gained a 'highest benefit' score and 37% were 'medium benefit'. 87% of the non-approved drugs had 'lowest benefit' scores. Median score for approved drugs was 4 vs. 1 for the non-approved (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Israeli decisions regarding reimbursement of novel cancer drugs, demonstrated concordance with ESMO-MCBS scores. Incorporation of ESMO-MCBS data in reimbursement deliberations could assist in framing the appropriate use of the limited resources to deliver effective and affordable cancer care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer drugs; ESMO; National Health Insurance; reimbursement decisions; value framework
Authors: Tanja Cufer; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Peter Berzinec; Gabriela Galffy; Marko Jakopovic; Jacek Jassem; Dragana Jovanovic; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Gyula Ostoros; Christiane Thallinger; Milada Zemanova; Christoph Zielinski Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-11-29
Authors: Tanja Cufer; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Peter Berzinec; Gabriela Galffy; Marko Jakopovic; Jacek Jassem; Dragana Jovanovic; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Gyula Ostoros; Christiane Thallinger; Milada Zemanova; Christoph Zielinski Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-11-29
Authors: Dario Trapani; Kiu Tay-Teo; Megan E Tesch; Felipe Roitberg; Manju Sengar; Sara C Altuna; Michael J Hassett; Armando A Genazzani; Aaron S Kesselheim; Giuseppe Curigliano Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Barbara Kiesewetter; Nathan I Cherny; Nicolas Boissel; Francesco Cerisoli; Urania Dafni; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Paolo Ghia; Nicola Gökbuget; Verónica González-Calle; Brian Huntly; Ulrich Jäger; Nicola Jane Latino; Jean-Yves Douillard; Luca Malcovati; María-Victoria Mateos; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Kimmo Porkka; Markus Raderer; Josep-Maria Ribera; Lydia Scarfò; Ruth Wester; Panagiota Zygoura; Pieter Sonneveld Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2020-01