Literature DB >> 28616889

Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model.

Robert L Heath1, Jaesub Lee1, Michael J Palenchar2, Laura L Lemon3.   

Abstract

Studies are continuously performed to improve risk communication campaign designs to better prepare residents to act in the safest manner during an emergency. To that end, this article investigates the predictive ability of the protective action decision model (PADM), which links environmental and social cues, predecision processes (attention, exposure, and comprehension), and risk decision perceptions (threat, alternative protective actions, and stakeholder norms) with protective action decision making. This current quasi-longitudinal study of residents (N = 400 for each year) in a high-risk (chemical release) petrochemical manufacturing community investigated whether PADM core risk perceptions predict protective action decision making. Telephone survey data collected at four intervals (1995, 1998, 2002, 2012) reveal that perceptions of protective actions and stakeholder norms, but not of threat, currently predict protective action decision making (intention to shelter in place). Of significance, rather than threat perceptions, perception of Wally Wise Guy (a spokes-character who advocates shelter in place) correlates with perceptions of protective action, stakeholder norms, and protective action decision making. Wally's response-efficacy advice predicts residents' behavioral intentions to shelter in place, thereby offering contextually sensitive support and refinement for PADM.
© 2017 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Emergency response; protective action decision model; risk spokes-characters: risk communication; theory of reasoned action

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616889     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

1.  From warning messages to preparedness behavior: The role of risk perception and information interaction in the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yanan Guo; Shi An; Tina Comes
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.842

2.  Official social media and its impact on public behavior during the first wave of COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Huan Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Returning Home after Decontamination? Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to a Nuclear Accident Scenario.

Authors:  Joel Rasmussen; Petter B Wikström
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.