| Literature DB >> 28616078 |
Verónica Sáez-Jiménez1,2, Jorge Rencoret3, Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Carvajal4, Ana Gutiérrez3, Francisco Javier Ruiz-Dueñas1, Angel T Martínez1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite claims as key enzymes in enzymatic delignification, very scarce information on the reaction rates between the ligninolytic versatile peroxidase (VP) and lignin peroxidase (LiP) and the lignin polymer is available, due to methodological difficulties related to lignin heterogeneity and low solubility.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylation; Catalytic tryptophan; Directed mutagenesis; Enzymatic delignification; Ligninolytic peroxidases; Methylation; NMR spectroscopy; Nonphenolic lignin; Single-electron transfer; Transient-state kinetics
Year: 2016 PMID: 28616078 PMCID: PMC5467052 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0615-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Kinetics of CII reduction by native (a), acetylated (b) and permethylated (c) softwood (LSS, red) and hardwood (LSH, blue) lignosulfonates: Native VP (continuous line) vs W164S variant (dashed line). Stopped-flow reactions were carried out at 25 °C in 0.1 M tartrate (pH 3). The lignosulfonate concentrations (here and in Additional file 1: Figure S2) refers to the lignosulfonate basic phenylpropanoid unit. Means and 95 % confidence limits are shown
CI reduction constants by acetylated, methylated and native (softwood and hardwood) lignosulfonates: Native VP vs W164S variant
| Softwood lignin | Hardwood lignin | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
|
| 35.7 ± 3.5 | – | – | 25.9 ± 1.9 | 8.4 ± 0.9 | 188 ± 7 |
|
| 111 ± 19 | – | – | 91 ± 13 | 66 ± 17 | 38 ± 3 |
|
| 320 ± 24 | 101 ± 8 | 2080 ± 80 | 289 ± 22 | 128 ± 19 | 4950 ± 190 |
|
| ||||||
|
| – | 8.9 ± 2.7 | – | 7.9 ± 0.4 | – | – |
|
| – | 355 ± 178 | – | 122 ± 11 | – | – |
|
| 60 ± 3 | 25 ± 5 | 627 ± 87 | 65 ± 2 | 12 ± 2 | 540 ± 15 |
CII reduction constants by acetylated, methylated and native (softwood and hardwood) lignosulfonates: Native VP vs W164S variant
| Softwood lignin | Hardwood lignin | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
|
| 14.4 ± 0.4 | 21.2 ± 2.0 | 48 ± 2 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | 18.4 ± 1.6 | 14 ± 1 |
|
| 24.1 ± 1.9 | 147 ± 25 | 143 ± 19 | 20.6 ± 2.5 | 226 ± 33 | 14 ± 2 |
|
| 599 ± 31 | 144 ± 10 | 340 ± 30 | 592 ± 52 | 82 ± 5 | 990 ± 80 |
|
| ||||||
|
| – | – | – | 1.6 ± 0.2 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | 98.2 ± 22.5 | – | – |
|
| 9.0 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 96 ± 12 | 16 ± 2 | 0.23 ± 0.07 | 8 ± 0.1 |
Fig. 2Lignosulfonate permethylation: 1H-NMR analysis after secondary acetylation confirming the previous complete methylation of softwood lignosulfonate (b) compared with the untreated sample (a). Regions of phenolic and alcoholic acetates are indicated
Fig. 3SEC profiles of softwood (a) and hardwood (b) lignosulfonates treated for 24 h with native VP and its W164S variant and control without enzyme, and sulfonated polystyrene standards (c). Lignosulfonate samples (12 g L−1) after a 24-h treatment with 1.2 µM native VP (green line) and its W164S variant (dashes) in presence of 9.5 mM H2O2, and the corresponding softwood (red) and hardwood (blue) lignosulfonate controls without enzyme, were analyzed in a Superdex-75 column using 0.15 M NaOH as eluent (0.5 mL·min−1) and detection at 280 nm. Sulfonated polystyrenes (Mp 78,400, 29,500, 10,200 and 4210 Da, from left to right) were used as molecular mass standards in c (arrow shows the excluded blue dextran elution volume)
Fig. 4HSQC NMR spectra of softwood (a–c) and hardwood (d–f) lignosulfonates treated for 24 h with native VP (b, e) and its W164S variant (c, f) and control without enzyme (a, d), and formulae of the main structures identified (g). Signals correspond to 13C-1H correlations at the different positions of lignin native/α-oxidized/α-sulfonated syringyl (red signals) and guaiacyl (green signals) units, α-sulfonated/non-sulfonated side chains in β-O-4′ (blue signals), phenylcoumaran (cyan signals), and resinol (purple signals) substructures, and methoxyls (orange signal) (gray, unassigned signals). Same amount of sample (40 mg before enzymatic treatment) and DMSO-d (0.75 mL) were used for all the spectra, which were normalized to the same intensity of the DMSO signal (not shown) for comparison. List of signals (δC/δH ppm): 53.2/3.46, Cβ/Hβ in phenylcoumarans ( ); 53.4/3.00, Cβ/Hβ in resinols ( ); 55.5/3.66, C/H in methoxyls (MeO); 59.4/3.4 and 3.72, Cγ/Hγ in β–O–4′ ( ); 61.1/4.00, Cγ/Hγ in sulfonated β–O–4´ (A ); 65.6/3.93, Cα/Hα in sulfonated β–O–4′ linked to a G-unit (A ); 67.2/4.02, Cα/Hα in sulfonated β–O–4′ linked to a S-unit (A ); 70.8/4.16 and 3.77, Cγ/Hγ in β-β′ resinols ( ); 71.1/4.72, Cα/Hα in β–O–4′ linked to a G-unit ( ); 71.5/4.85, Cα/Hα in β–O–4′ linked to a S-unit ( ); 79.3/4.91, Cβ/Hβ in sulfonated β–O–4′ linked to a G unit (A ); 80.9/4.67, Cβ/Hβ in sulfonated β–O–4′ linked to a S unit (A ); 83.3/4.24, Cβ/Hβ in β–O–4′ linked to a G unit ( ); 84.9/4.59, Cα/Hα in β-β′ resinols ( ); 85.7/4.08, Cβ/Hβ in β–O–4′ linked to a S unit ( ); 86.7/5.41, Cα/Hα in phenylcoumarans ( ); 103.8/6.68, C2/H2 and C6/H6 in syringyl units ( ); 106.2/7.29, C2/H2 and C6/H6 in α-oxidized syringyl units ( ); 108.0/6.68, C2/H2 and C6/H6 in sulfonated syringyl units (S ); 114.0/6.60 and 114.3/6.87, C2/H2 and C5/H5 in guaiacyl units (G /G ); and 122.8/6.75, C6/H6 in guaiacyl units (G ) (minor, and largely overlapping, signals of C2/H2, C5/H5 and C6/H6 correlations in non-sulfonated guaiacyl units would appear at 110.7/6.93, 114.2/6.65 and 118.6/6.79 ppm, respectively; not shown). Three additional aromatic signals in the treated samples, at 126.1/7.14, 127.7/7.21 and 128.9/7.22 ppm, were assigned to protein (phenylalanine residues in the added enzyme)