Literature DB >> 28613433

A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.

Glenn Suter1, Susan Cormier1, Mace Barron2.   

Abstract

The weighing of heterogeneous evidence such as conventional laboratory toxicity tests, field tests, biomarkers, and community surveys is essential to environmental assessments. Evidence synthesis and weighing is needed to determine causes of observed effects, hazards posed by chemicals or other agents, the completeness of remediation, and other environmental qualities. As part of its guidelines for weight of evidence (WoE) in ecological assessments, the US Environmental Protection Agency has developed a generally applicable framework. Its basic steps are these: assemble evidence, weight the evidence, and weigh the body of evidence. Use of the framework can increase the consistency and rigor of WoE practices and provide greater transparency than ad hoc and narrative-based approaches. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:1038-1044. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causation; Ecological risk; Risk assessment; Systematic review; Weight of evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28613433      PMCID: PMC5726519          DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  13 in total

Review 1.  Burden of proof: judging science and protecting public health in (and out of) the courtroom.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Weighing the evidence of ecological risk from chemical contamination in the estuarine environment adjacent to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, USA.

Authors:  Robert K Johnston; Wayne R Munns; Patti Lynne Tyler; Patty Marajh-Whittemore; Kenneth Finkelstein; Kenneth Munney; Fred T Short; Ann Melville; Simeon P Hahn
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  Weight of evidence: a review of concept and methods.

Authors:  Douglas L Weed
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Design and application of a transparent and scalable weight-of-evidence framework: an example from Wabamun Lake, Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Blair G McDonald; Adrian M H deBruyn; Barbara G Wernick; Luanne Patterson; Normand Pellerin; Peter M Chapman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 5.  A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman; Lisa A Bailey; Robyn L Prueitt; Nancy B Beck; Christopher Bevan; Michael Honeycutt; Norbert E Kaminski; Greg Paoli; Lynn H Pottenger; Roberta W Scherer; Kimberly C Wise; Richard A Becker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 6.  Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Igor Linkov; Drew Loney; Susan Cormier; F Kyle Satterstrom; Todd Bridges
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Why and how to combine evidence in environmental assessments: weighing evidence and building cases.

Authors:  Glenn W Suter; Susan M Cormier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring quantities.

Authors:  Glenn Suter; Susan Cormier; Mace Barron
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 9.  Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.

Authors:  Caroline Moermond; Amy Beasley; Roger Breton; Marion Junghans; Ryszard Laskowski; Keith Solomon; Holly Zahner
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.992

10.  Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making.

Authors:  Christina Rudén; Julie Adams; Marlene Ågerstrand; Theo Cm Brock; Veronique Poulsen; Christian E Schlekat; James R Wheeler; Tala R Henry
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.992

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing background levels of specific conductivity using weight of evidence.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Glenn W Suter; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Multi-Strategy Assessment of Different Uses of QSAR under REACH Analysis of Alternatives to Advance Information Transparency.

Authors:  Kazue Chinen; Timothy Malloy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.