Literature DB >> 28613402

A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring quantities.

Glenn Suter1, Susan Cormier1, Mace Barron2.   

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has developed a generally applicable framework for a weight-of-evidence (WoE) process for deriving quantitative values from multiple estimates. These guidelines are intended for environmental assessments that require the generation of quantitative parameters such as degradation rates or that develop quantitative products such as criterion values or magnitudes of effects. The basic steps are to weigh evidence for the environmental quality to be quantified, generate the value by merging estimates or by identifying the best estimate, and weight the results to determine confidence in the numerical value. When multiple data sets or outputs of multiple models are available, it may be appropriate to weigh the evidence. Use of the framework to weigh multiple estimates may increase the accuracy of quantitative results compared to a single estimate from a default method. Its use can provide greater transparency compared to ad hoc weighing of evidence. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:1045-1051. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  Meta analysis; Parameter estimation; Risk assessment; Water quality criteria; Weight of evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28613402      PMCID: PMC5726517          DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  6 in total

1.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

2.  Can meta-analyses be trusted?

Authors:  S G Thompson; S J Pocock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Using field data and weight of evidence to develop water quality criteria.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; John F Paul; Robert L Spehar; Patricia Shaw-Allen; Walter J Berry; Glenn W Suter
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 4.  Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Igor Linkov; Drew Loney; Susan Cormier; F Kyle Satterstrom; Todd Bridges
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Cross-species coherence in effects and modes of action in support of causality determinations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Science Assessment for Lead.

Authors:  Meredith Gooding Lassiter; Elizabeth Oesterling Owens; Molini M Patel; Ellen Kirrane; Meagan Madden; Jennifer Richmond-Bryant; Erin Pias Hines; J Allen Davis; Lisa Vinikoor-Imler; Jean-Jacques Dubois
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  A weight-of-evidence approach for deriving a level of concern for atrazine that is protective of aquatic plant communities.

Authors:  Dwayne Rj Moore; Colleen D Greer; Gillian Manning; Katie Wooding; Kerrie J Beckett; Richard A Brain; Gary Marshall
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.992

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.

Authors:  Glenn Suter; Susan Cormier; Mace Barron
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  How Specific Is Site-Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks.

Authors:  Rick A van Dam; Alicia C Hogan; Andrew J Harford; Chris L Humphrey
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.