Narendra K Arora1. 1. The INCLEN Trust International, F-1/5, 2nd Floor, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi 110020, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About 16 billion injections are administered each year worldwide, and at least half of them are unsafe. India contributes 25% to 30% of the global injection load. A majority of curative injections are unnecessary. The present study was undertaken to assess the burden of injections and prevalent injection practices in India. METHODS: A nationwide population-based cluster survey (1200 clusters; 24 021 subjects) at household level; along with observations, interview of prescribers (2402), and exit interview of the patients (12 012) at health facility level in the selected clusters was carried out -using probability proportionate to size (PPS) technique. Observations at health facility included generic observation (3592), observation of injection process (17 844), and observation of prescriber-client interaction (24 030). RESULTS: The frequency of injections was 2.9 (95%CI: 2.8-3.2) per person/year. Of the total injections, 62.9% (95%CI: 60.7-65.0) were unsafe. Injections administered for curative purpose constituted 82.5% and a large majorly of these were prescribed for common symptoms like fever/cough/diarrhoea. Use of glass syringes was consistently associated with potential risk of blood-borne viral transmission. Satisfactory disposal of injection waste was observed at 61.3% (95%CI: 58.2-64.3) of the health facilities, and at 50.9% (95%CI: 46.7-55.2) of the immunization clinics. Significant differences were observed in the injection prescription pattern in public and private facilities, and in rural and urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Three billion injections were estimated to be administered annually in India; of them 1.89 billion were unsafe. Evidence suggests that the micro-level leadership for reducing injection overuse and making injections safer lies with the prescriber.
BACKGROUND: About 16 billion injections are administered each year worldwide, and at least half of them are unsafe. India contributes 25% to 30% of the global injection load. A majority of curative injections are unnecessary. The present study was undertaken to assess the burden of injections and prevalent injection practices in India. METHODS: A nationwide population-based cluster survey (1200 clusters; 24 021 subjects) at household level; along with observations, interview of prescribers (2402), and exit interview of the patients (12 012) at health facility level in the selected clusters was carried out -using probability proportionate to size (PPS) technique. Observations at health facility included generic observation (3592), observation of injection process (17 844), and observation of prescriber-client interaction (24 030). RESULTS: The frequency of injections was 2.9 (95%CI: 2.8-3.2) per person/year. Of the total injections, 62.9% (95%CI: 60.7-65.0) were unsafe. Injections administered for curative purpose constituted 82.5% and a large majorly of these were prescribed for common symptoms like fever/cough/diarrhoea. Use of glass syringes was consistently associated with potential risk of blood-borne viral transmission. Satisfactory disposal of injection waste was observed at 61.3% (95%CI: 58.2-64.3) of the health facilities, and at 50.9% (95%CI: 46.7-55.2) of the immunization clinics. Significant differences were observed in the injection prescription pattern in public and private facilities, and in rural and urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Three billion injections were estimated to be administered annually in India; of them 1.89 billion were unsafe. Evidence suggests that the micro-level leadership for reducing injection overuse and making injections safer lies with the prescriber.
Authors: S S Solomon; M S Sulkowski; P Amrose; A K Srikrishnan; A M McFall; B Ramasamy; M S Kumar; S Anand; D L Thomas; S H Mehta Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Gudadappa S Kasabi; Thilakavathi Subramanian; Ramesh Reddy Allam; Chitra A Grace; Shivanna Reddy; Manoj V Murhekar Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Antoine Chaillon; Sanjay R Mehta; Martin Hoenigl; Sunil S Solomon; Peter Vickerman; Matthew Hickman; Britt Skaathun; Natasha K Martin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shih-Chao Kang; Chun-Chi Lin; Chia-Chen Tsai; Yin-Chieh Chang; Chi-Yi Wu; Ke-Chang Chang; Su-Shun Lo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.390