Literature DB >> 33989509

Examining unsafe injection practices associated with auto-disable (AD) syringes: a systematic review.

Anokhi Ali Khan1, Mehr Munir1, Fatima Miraj1, Shayan Imran1, Danya Arif Siddiqi2, Arshad Altaf3, Aamir Javed Khan2, Subhash Chandir2,4.   

Abstract

Auto-disable (AD) syringes are specifically designed to prevent syringe reuse. However, the notion that specific AD syringe designs may be unsafe due to reuse concerns related to the syringe's activation point has surfaced. We conducted a systematic review for evidence on the association between AD syringe design and syringe reuse, adverse events following immunization (AEFI), or blood borne virus (BBV) transmission. We found no evidence of an association between AD syringe design and unsafe injection practices including syringe reuse, AEFIs, or BBVs. Authors of three records speculated about the possibility of AD syringe reuse through intentionally defeating the disabling mechanism, and one hinted at the possibility of reuse of larger-than-required syringes, but none reported any actual reuse instance. In contrast to AD syringes, standard disposable syringes continue to be reused; therefore, the global health community should expand the use of AD syringes in both immunization and therapeutic context as an essential strategy for curbing BBV transmission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auto–disable syringe; activation point; adverse events following immunization; bloodborne diseases; disposable syringe; syringe design; syringe reuse; unsafe injection practices

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33989509      PMCID: PMC8381785          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1911514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  62 in total

Review 1.  The cost of unsafe injections.

Authors:  M A Miller; E Pisani
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Anthropological perspectives on injections: a review.

Authors:  A V Reeler
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  An assessment of safe injection practices in health facilities in Swaziland.

Authors:  A D Daly; M P Nxumalo; R J Biellik
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2004-03

Review 4.  Unsafe injections in the developing world and transmission of bloodborne pathogens: a review.

Authors:  L Simonsen; A Kane; J Lloyd; M Zaffran; M Kane
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Unsafe injection practices in Gujarat, India.

Authors:  N B Pandit; S K Choudhary
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Evaluation of immunization injection safety in China, 2010: achievements, future sustainability.

Authors:  Zhenhua Wu; Fuqiang Cui; Yuansheng Chen; Ning Miao; Xiaohong Gong; Huiming Luo; Fuzhen Wang; Hui Zheng; Mark Kane; Stephen C Hadler; Yvan J Hutin; Xiaofeng Liang; Weizhong Yang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Contamination of medicine injection paraphernalia used by registered medical practitioners in south India: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  M Lakshman; M Nichter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Determinants of therapeutic injection overuse among communities in Sindh, Pakistan.

Authors:  Arshad Altaf; Zafar Fatmi; Agha Ajmal; Tanweer Hussain; Henna Qahir; Mubina Agboatwalla
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

9.  Study on the injection practices of health facilities in Jingzhou district, Hubei, China.

Authors:  Youwang Yan; Guangping Zhang; Yu Chen; Anqiang Zhang; Yong Guan; Hongping Ao
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2006-10

10.  Unsafe injection practices: a potential weapon for the outbreak of blood borne viruses in the community.

Authors:  E Gupta; M Bajpai; P Sharma; A Shah; Sk Sarin
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.