Literature DB >> 28612174

An Enhanced Shared Decision Making Model to Address Willingness and Ability to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Treatment in Minority Underserved Populations.

Cherie P Erkmen1,2, Mark Mitchell1, Simran Randhawa3, Shelby Sferra4, Rachel Kim4, Verdi DiSesa4, Larry R Kaiser1, Grace X Ma5,6.   

Abstract

Failure to address willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer treatment before lung cancer screening could cause patients unnecessary anxiety, cost and care. We employed an enhanced shared decision making (SDM) model to address willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer screening of low dose CT (LDCT) scanning. We hypothesized that enhanced SDM was feasible and did not discourage patients from undergoing lung cancer screening. We performed a prospective study of patients referred for lung cancer screening. We measured adherence to the LCS protocol, including consent to discuss lung cancer treatment if cancer is found and direct questions to patients about willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer treatment. We measured race, gender, adherence to the consent process and questions regarding willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer treatment and subsequent uptake of LDCT. All 190 patients have a documented SDM visit addressing the risks and benefits of lung cancer screening and consented to discuss lung cancer treatment if lung cancer is diagnosed. One hundred and seventy-nine (179) of 190 (94%) answered yes to being willing and able to undergo lung cancer treatment. One hundred and eighty-seven (187) patients underwent LDCT (98.4%). Discussion about willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer treatment should be an essential component of a SDM discussion prior to LDCT. This study demonstrated that an enhanced SDM experience is feasible in a clinical setting. Furthermore, patients proceeded with LDCT following the enhanced SDM process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Oncology; Screening; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28612174     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0383-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  9 in total

1.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups.

Authors:  Michael T Jaklitsch; Francine L Jacobson; John H M Austin; John K Field; James R Jett; Shaf Keshavjee; Heber MacMahon; James L Mulshine; Reginald F Munden; Ravi Salgia; Gary M Strauss; Scott J Swanson; William D Travis; David J Sugarbaker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Andy S L Tan; Ramzi G Salloum; Kelly C Young-Wolff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-05-17

3.  An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Douglas A Arenberg; David H Au; Kathleen Fennig; Carla R Lamb; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; Maryann Napoli; David E Ost; Charles A Powell; M Patricia Rivera; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Anil Vachani; Juan P Wisnivesky; Sue H Yoon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  William C Black; Ilana F Gareen; Samir S Soneji; JoRean D Sicks; Emmett B Keeler; Denise R Aberle; Arash Naeim; Timothy R Church; Gerard A Silvestri; Jeremy Gorelick; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States.

Authors:  Jiemin Ma; Elizabeth M Ward; Robert Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  The number of women who would need to be screened regularly by mammography to prevent one death from breast cancer.

Authors:  Valerie Beral; Maggie Alexander; Stephen Duffy; Ian O Ellis; Rosalind Given-Wilson; Lars Holmberg; Sue M Moss; Amanda Ramirez; Malcolm W R Reed; Caroline Rubin; Patsy Whelehan; Robin Wilson; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Examining Gender Differences in Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Simran Randhawa; Shelby R Sferra; Chandra Das; Larry R Kaiser; Grace X Ma; Cherie P Erkmen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-10

2.  Adherence to annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan in a diverse population.

Authors:  Cherie P Erkmen; Farouk Dako; Ryan Moore; Chandra Dass; Mark G Weiner; Larry R Kaiser; Grace X Ma
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.