Literature DB >> 32323173

Examining Gender Differences in Lung Cancer Screening.

Simran Randhawa1, Shelby R Sferra2, Chandra Das3, Larry R Kaiser4, Grace X Ma5, Cherie P Erkmen6.   

Abstract

It is unknown if gender influences outcome of lung cancer screening with Low Dose CT (LDCT), especially with frequent and continued underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. We examined a balanced cohort of men and women with the hypothesis that there would be no difference in participation or results between men and women undergoing lung cancer screening. In an urban, academic medical center, we prospectively collected data on patients referred for lung cancer screening from October 2015 to August 2018. We studied gender, age, ethnicity, level of education and smoking history. We measured results of LDCT using Lung-RADS reporting system. 546 patients underwent LDCT between October 2015 and August 2018. 279 (51%) were female and 267 (49%) were males. Age, education status or smoking patterns did not significantly differ between females and males There was a significant difference between males and females in the distribution of LDCT results (p = 0.05). 81 females and 105 males were diagnosed with Lung-RADS 1; 99 females and 92 males with Lung-RADS 2; 15 females and 8 males with Lung-RADS 3; 19 females and 11 males with Lung-RADS 4. Overall, 10 females (3.5%) and 3 males (1.1%) were diagnosed with lung cancer (risk difference 2.4, 95% CI-0.0006-0.05, p = 0.09). Women are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Preliminary results from our lung cancer screening program demonstrate equal participation and equal benefit from the screening program. Long term data is needed to study survival benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low dose CT scan; Lung cancer screening; Smoking cessation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32323173      PMCID: PMC7725370          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00826-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  14 in total

1.  Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Lung Cancer Screening in the Community Setting: Challenges for Adoption.

Authors:  Simran Randhawa; Gary Drizin; Tracy Kane; Grace Y Song; Thomas Reilly; Doraid Jarrar
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Lung cancer detectability by test, histology, stage, and gender: estimates from the NLST and the PLCO trials.

Authors:  Kevin Ten Haaf; Joost van Rosmalen; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  NELSON trial: reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening.

Authors:  Quintina Dawson
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Linda S Kinsinger; Charles Anderson; Jane Kim; Martha Larson; Stephanie H Chan; Heather A King; Kathryn L Rice; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Kathleen Pittman; Robert J Monte; Rebecca B McNeil; Janet M Grubber; Michael J Kelley; Dawn Provenzale; Santanu K Datta; Nina S Sperber; Lottie K Barnes; David H Abbott; Kellie J Sims; Richard L Whitley; R Ryanne Wu; George L Jackson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Population-based trends in lung cancer incidence in women.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Sibele I Meireles; Douglas B Flieder; Margie L Clapper
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A pilot test of a combined tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Amy K Ferketich; Gregory A Otterson; Mark King; Nathan Hall; Kristine K Browning; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Catherine Duda; Irene Mahon; Mei Hsiu Chen; Bradley Snyder; Richard Barr; Caroline Chiles; Robert Falk; Elliot K Fishman; David Gemmel; Jonathan G Goldin; Kathleen Brown; Reginald F Munden; Kay Vydareny; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Overcoming Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening by Implementing a Single-Visit Patient Experience.

Authors:  Cherie P Erkmen; Ryan F Moore; Clifford Belden; Verdi DiSesa; Larry R Kaiser; Grace X Ma; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  Int J Cancer Oncol       Date:  2017-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.