Ekaterina Petrova1, Felix Rückert2, Sebastian Zach2, YinFeng Shen1,3, Jürgen Weitz4, Robert Grützmann4,5, Uwe A Wittel6, Frank Makowiec6, Ulrich T Hopt6, Peter Bronsert7, Florian Kühn8, Bettina M Rau8, Roman E Izrailov9, Igor E Khatkov9, Hryhoriy Lapshyn1, Louisa Bolm1, Dirk Bausch1, Tobias Keck10, Ulrich F Wellner1, Gabriel Seifert6. 1. Clinic of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. 2. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. 3. Department of Surgery, Hubei Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430061, People's Republic of China. 4. Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery at the University Hospital, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 5. Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. 6. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 7. Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 8. Department of General, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Rostock University Hospital, Rostock, Germany. 9. Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia. 10. Clinic of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. tobias.keck@uksh.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the most common operative procedure performed for distal bile duct carcinoma. Data on outcome after surgery for this rare malignancy is scarce, especially from western countries. The purpose of this study is to explore the prognostic factors and outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma. METHODS: Patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma were identified from institutional databases of five German and one Russian academic centers for pancreatic surgery. Univariable and multivariable general linear model, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors for postoperative mortality and overall survival. RESULTS: N = 228 patients operated from 1994 to 2015 were included. Reoperation (OR 5.38, 95%CI 1.51-19.22, p = 0.010), grade B/C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.13-12.35, p = 0.031), grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 4.29, 95%CI 1.25-14.72, p = 0.038), and advanced age (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.12-14.03, p = 0.033) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in multivariable analysis. Median survival was 29 months, 5-year survival 27%. Positive resection margin (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.29-3.33, p = 0.003), high tumor grade (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.13-2.58, p = 0.010), lymph node (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.13-2.51, p = 0.011), and distant metastases (HR 2.70, 95%CI 1.21-5.58, p = 0.014), as well as severe non-fatal postoperative complications (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.04-2.58, p = 0.033) were independent negative prognostic factors for survival in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Distant metastases and positive resection margin are the strongest negative prognostic factors for survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma; thus, surgery with curative intent is only warranted in patients with local disease, where R0 resection is feasible.
PURPOSE: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the most common operative procedure performed for distal bile duct carcinoma. Data on outcome after surgery for this rare malignancy is scarce, especially from western countries. The purpose of this study is to explore the prognostic factors and outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma. METHODS:Patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma were identified from institutional databases of five German and one Russian academic centers for pancreatic surgery. Univariable and multivariable general linear model, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors for postoperative mortality and overall survival. RESULTS: N = 228 patients operated from 1994 to 2015 were included. Reoperation (OR 5.38, 95%CI 1.51-19.22, p = 0.010), grade B/C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.13-12.35, p = 0.031), grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 4.29, 95%CI 1.25-14.72, p = 0.038), and advanced age (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.12-14.03, p = 0.033) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in multivariable analysis. Median survival was 29 months, 5-year survival 27%. Positive resection margin (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.29-3.33, p = 0.003), high tumor grade (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.13-2.58, p = 0.010), lymph node (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.13-2.51, p = 0.011), and distant metastases (HR 2.70, 95%CI 1.21-5.58, p = 0.014), as well as severe non-fatal postoperative complications (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.04-2.58, p = 0.033) were independent negative prognostic factors for survival in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Distant metastases and positive resection margin are the strongest negative prognostic factors for survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma; thus, surgery with curative intent is only warranted in patients with local disease, where R0 resection is feasible.
Authors: Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Nakeeb; H A Pitt; T A Sohn; J Coleman; R A Abrams; S Piantadosi; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Margaret A Tempero; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna R Hollis; Hedy L Kindler; Michael Cusnir; Peter C Enzinger; Stefan M Gorsch; Richard M Goldberg; Robert J Mayer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marius Distler; Felix Rückert; Maximilian Hunger; Stephan Kersting; Christian Pilarsky; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Robert Grützmann Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Rosa B Schmuck; Cynthia V de Carvalho-Fischer; Christopher Neumann; Johann Pratschke; Marcus Bahra Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Stefan Buettner; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Matthew Weiss; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Weiyao Li; Javier Martinez-Useros; Nuria Garcia-Carbonero; Maria J Fernandez-Aceñero; Luis Ortega-Medina; Sandra Garcia-Botella; Elia Perez-Aguirre; Luis Diez-Valladares; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Oliver Beetz; Michael Klein; Harald Schrem; Jill Gwiasda; Florian W R Vondran; Felix Oldhafer; Sebastian Cammann; Jürgen Klempnauer; Karl J Oldhafer; Moritz Kleine Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.102