| Literature DB >> 28611384 |
Jianhai Wang1, Keqiu Li1, Xiaoning Zhang1, Dahong Teng2, Mingyan Ju1, Yaqing Jing1, Yuxia Zhao1, Guang Li3.
Abstract
Immunosuppressive medications, such as tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, are commonly used for reducing the risk of organ rejection in receipts of allogeneic organ transplant. The optimal dosages of these drugs are required for preventing rejection and avoiding toxicity to receipts. This study aimed to identify the correlation between the expression profiling of genes involved in drug metabolism and the blood level of tacrolimus in liver transplant receipts. Sixty-four liver transplant receipts were enrolled in this retrospective study. Receipts were divided into low (2-5.9 ng/ml) and high (6-15 ng/ml) tacrolimus groups. Clinical assessment showed that the blood level of tacrolimus was inversely correlated with the liver function evaluated by blood levels of total bilirubin and creatinine. Compared to the high tacrolimus group, expression levels of six cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP1A1, CYP2B6, CYP3A5, CYP4A11, CYP19A1, and CYP17A1 were significantly higher in the low tacrolimus group. The expression levels of these genes were negatively correlated with the tacrolimus blood level. Enzyme assays showed that CYP3A5 and CYP17A1 exerted direct metabolic effects on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, respectively. These results support clinical application of this expression profiling of genes in drug metabolism for selection of immunosuppressive medications and optimal dosages for organ transplant receipts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28611384 PMCID: PMC5469744 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02698-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic characteristics of recipients at the third week after liver transplantation.
| Gender (female/male) | (15/49) |
|---|---|
| Blood type (A/B/AB/O) | (18/20/8/18) |
| Age (year) | 51.29 ± 8.89 |
| Bodyweight (kg) | 71.87 ± 18.25 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.64 ± 4.17 |
| Tacrolimus dosage (mg/day) | 2.56 ± 0.85 (0.5–4) |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 37.63 ± 4.41 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 99.07 ± 21.90 |
| ALT (U/L) | 61.50 ± 64.77 |
| AST (U/L) | 30.47 ± 23.27 |
| ALP (U/L) | 144.51 ± 80.90 |
| GGT (U/L) | 88.41 ± 59.27 |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 29.08 ± 37.78 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 79.00 ± 31.00 |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 7.86 ± 5.56 |
Clinical parameters in blood are shown as Mean ± S.D.
Figure 1The correlation between the blood tacrolimus level and the blood levels of total bilirubin and creatinine in liver transplant receipts.
Figure 2Heat map of three human drug metabolism PCR arrays. (A) Drug metabolism PCR array, (B) Phase I enzymes PCR array, (C) Phase II enzymes PCR array. Gene expression levels in low and the high tacrolimus (Tac) groups in liver transplant receipts are shown.
Figure 3Validation of gene expression levels in the blood of low and the high tacrolimus (Tac) groups in liver transplant receipts. RNA from the blood of receipts was prepared for real-time PCR analysis of gene expression levels. Relative expression levels of indicated genes are shown. The average of the gene expression level from the low Tac group was set as 1, and gene expression levels in receipts were compared to this value.
Figure 4Linear regression analysis of the correlation between the blood tacrolimus level and the indicated gene expression level in liver transplant receipts.
Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the blood level of tacrolimus and the gene expression level.
| Coefficients* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| β | Standard deviation |
| |
|
| −1.295 | 0.586 | 0.034 |
|
| −0.055 | 0.024 | 0.032 |
|
| −0.094 | 0.044 | 0.040 |
|
| −0.014 | 0.023 | 0.539 |
|
| 0.187 | 0.259 | 0.476 |
|
| 0.030 | 0.035 | 0.389 |
*Dependent variable: the blood level of tacrolimus, adjusted by age, sex, dosage of tacrolimus, and BMI.
The enzyme assay results.
| Enzymes | Control group (RT0–RT90)/RT0 | Experimental group (RT0–RT90)/RT0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| CYP17A1 | 0.0017 ± 0.0582 | 0.0122 ± 0.0286 | |
| CYP2B6 | 0.0410 ± 0.1047 | 0.0695 ± 0.0198 | |
| CYP1A1 | −0.0691 ± 0.0771 | 0.0056 ± 0.0674 | |
| CYP4A11 | −0.0753 ± 0.1091 | −0.0791 ± 0.2259 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| CYP2B6 | 0.0336 ± 0.0446 | 0.0238 ± 0.0196 | |
| CYP1A1 | 0.3926 ± 0.0440 | 0.4955 ± 0.0425 | |
| CYP4A11 | 0.5148 ± 0.1513 | 0.5343 ± 0.1589 | |
|
| CYP17A1 | −0.0242 ± 0.0564 | 0.0023 ± 0.0710 |
| CYP2B6 | 0.0015 ± 0.0426 | −0.0031 ± 0.0361 | |
| CYP1A1 | −0.0105 ± 0.0030 | 0.0013 ± 0.0708 | |
| CYP4A11 | 0.0102 ± 0.0760 | 0.0133 ± 0.1155 |
RT0: the relative peak area of substrate before reaction; RT90: the relative peak area of substrate at 90 min after reaction. *p < 0.05 compared to the control group. Data are analyzed from three independent experiments.