Literature DB >> 25920086

From immunosuppression to tolerance.

David H Adams1, Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo2, Didier Samuel3.   

Abstract

The past three decades have seen liver transplantation becoming a major therapeutic approach in the management of end-stage liver diseases. This is due to the dramatic improvement in survival after liver transplantation as a consequence of the improvement of surgical and anaesthetic techniques, of post-transplant medico-surgical management and of prevention of disease recurrence and other post-transplant complications. Improved use of post-transplant immunosuppression to prevent acute and chronic rejection is a major factor in these improved results. The liver has been shown to be more tolerogenic than other organs, and matching of donor and recipients is mainly limited to ABO blood group compatibility. However, long-term immunosuppression is required to avoid severe acute and chronic rejection and graft loss. With the current immunosuppression protocols, the risk of acute rejection requiring additional therapy is 10-40% and the risk of chronic rejection is below 5%. However, the development of histological lesions in the graft in long-term survivors suggest atypical forms of graft rejection may develop as a consequence of under-immunosuppression. The backbone of immunosuppression remains calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) mostly in association with steroids in the short-term and mycophenolate mofetil or mTOR inhibitors (everolimus). The occurrence of post-transplant complications related to the immunosuppressive therapy has led to the development of new protocols aimed at protecting renal function and preventing the development of de novo cancer and of dysmetabolic syndrome. However, there is no new class of immunosuppressive drugs in the pipeline able to replace current protocols in the near future. The aim of a full immune tolerance of the graft is rarely achieved since only 20% of selected patients can be weaned successfully off immunosuppression. In the future, immunosuppression will probably be more case oriented aiming to protect the graft from rejection and at reducing the risk of disease recurrence and complications related to immunosuppressive therapy. Such approaches will include strategies aiming to promote stable long-term immunological tolerance of the liver graft.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcineurin inhibitors; Immune tolerance; Immunosuppression; mTOR inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920086     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  34 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of adaptation and progression in idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury, clinical implications.

Authors:  Lily Dara; Zhang-Xu Liu; Neil Kaplowitz
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.828

Review 2.  Using a weaning immunosuppression protocol in liver transplantation recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a compromise between the risk of recurrence and the risk of rejection?

Authors:  Roberta Angelico; Alessandro Parente; Tommaso Maria Manzia
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-21

3.  Implantation of healthy matrix-embedded endothelial cells rescues dysfunctional endothelium and ischaemic tissue in liver engraftment.

Authors:  Pedro Melgar-Lesmes; Mercedes Balcells; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Range of Normal Serum Aminotransferase Levels in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Mohammad Bilal Siddiqui; Samarth Patel; Chandra Bhati; Trevor Reichman; Kenyada Williams; Carolyn Driscoll; Erika Liptrap; Mary E Rinella; Richard K Sterling; M Shadab Siddiqui
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2019 Jul - Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Acute coronary syndrome after liver transplantation in a young primary biliary cholangitis recipient with dyslipidemia: a case report.

Authors:  Siyuan Yao; Akiho Iwashita; Shintaro Yagi; Hirotoshi Watanabe; Takahiro Nishio; Yukinori Koyama; Kazuyuki Nagai; Naoko Kamo; Kojiro Taura; Etsuro Hatano
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Serum MicroRNA Transcriptomics and Acute Rejection or Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus in Human Liver Allograft Recipients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Thangamani Muthukumar; Kemal M Akat; Hua Yang; Joseph E Schwartz; Carol Li; Heejung Bang; Iddo Z Ben-Dov; John R Lee; David Ikle; Anthony J Demetris; Thomas Tuschl; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Immunosuppression status of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C affects biopsy-proven acute rejection.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Kwang-Woong Lee; Gi-Won Song; Bo-Hyun Jung; Hae Won Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; ChoonHyuck David Kwon; Shin Hwang; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jae-Won Joh; Suk-Koo Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-25

8.  Scientometric analysis of mTOR signaling pathway in liver disease.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Long Pan; Qiu-Xia Gu; Sarun Juengpanich; Jun-Hao Zheng; Chen-Hao Tong; Zi-Yuan Wang; Jun-Jie Nan; Yi-Fan Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

9.  High Mobility Group Box 1 Contributes to the Acute Rejection of Liver Allografts by Activating Dendritic Cells.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Wenmin Zhang; Hui Bao; Wubing He; Lihong Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Kinetics of Alloantigen-Specific Regulatory CD4 T Cell Development and Tissue Distribution After Donor-Specific Transfusion and Costimulatory Blockade.

Authors:  Yusuke Tomita; Miwa Satomi; William Bracamonte-Baran; Ewa Jankowska Gan; Andrea Szymczak Workman; Creg J Workman; Dario Angelo Alberto Vignali; William J Burlingham
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.