Literature DB >> 28609261

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnostic Challenge in a Nonendemic Setting: Our Experience with 101 Patients.

Kevin H Wang1, Stephanie A Austin2, Sonia H Chen3, David C Sonne4, Deepak Gurushanthaiah5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We studied the presenting symptoms, time intervals, and workup involved in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in an integrated health care system.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with a nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis between 2007 and 2010 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Main outcome measures included diagnostic time intervals, presenting symptoms, diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy, imaging, and diagnosis at first otolaryngologist (Oto-HNS) visit.
RESULTS: This study included 101 patients: 70 (70%) were of Chinese or of Southeast Asian descent. The median time intervals along the diagnostic pathway were symptom onset to primary care physician visit, 6.0 weeks; primary care physician to Oto-HNS, 2.4 weeks; Oto-HNS to pathologic diagnosis, 1.1 weeks; and diagnosis to treatment onset, 5.5 weeks. The most common presenting symptoms were otologic issues (41, 41%), neck mass (39, 39%), nasal issues (32, 32%), and headache/cranial neuropathy (16, 16%). A nasopharyngeal lesion was detected in 54 (53%) patients after the first Oto-HNS visit. Among the initial nasal endoscopy reports, 32 (32%) did not reveal a nasopharyngeal lesion; 32 (32%) initial imaging studies also did not reveal a nasopharyngeal lesion. There was no correlation between diagnostic delay and disease stage.
CONCLUSION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma presenting symptoms are extremely variable, and initial misdiagnosis is common. Median time from symptom onset to treatment was almost six months among patients studied. Nearly one-third of nasopharyngeal cancers were missed with nasal endoscopy and imaging. An understanding of the risk factors, presenting symptoms, and limitations associated with these diagnostic tests is necessary to support earlier detection of this insidious cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609261      PMCID: PMC5469434          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/16-180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  10 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: presenting symptoms and duration before diagnosis.

Authors:  A WM Lee; W Foo; S CK Law; Y F Poon; W M Sze; S K O; S Y Tung; W H Lau
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.227

2.  Endoscopic assessment of the nasopharynx: an objective score of abnormality to predict the likelihood of malignancy.

Authors:  Alexander C Vlantis; Wendy F Bower; John K S Woo; Michael C F Tong; C Andrew van Hasselt
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese immigrants, compared with Chinese in China and South East Asia: review.

Authors:  W M Yu; S S M Hussain
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  A D King; A C Vlantis; R K Y Tsang; T M K Gary; A K Y Au; C Y Chan; S Y Kok; W T Kwok; H K Lui; A T Ahuja
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy.

Authors:  Ann D King; Alexander C Vlantis; Kunwar S S Bhatia; Benny C Y Zee; John K S Woo; Gary M K Tse; Anthony T C Chan; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: clinical assessment and review of 176 cases.

Authors:  M August; T B Dodson; A Nastri; S K Chuang
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-02

8.  Has survival improved for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the United States?

Authors:  Jivianne T Lee; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17

10.  The anatomy of the Fossa of Rosenmuller--its possible influence on the detection of occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L E Loh; T S Chee; A B John
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.858

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) and the Presence of Macrophage M2 and T Regulatory Cells in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Iffah Mardhiyah; Yustina Nuke Ardiyan; Siti Hamidatul Aliyah; Enda Cindylosa Sitepu; Camelia Herdini; Ery Kus Dwianingsih; Fatin Asfarina; Sumartiningsih Sumartiningsih; Jajah Fachiroh; Dewi Kartikawati Paramita
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-08-01

2.  Down-regulated long non-coding RNA LHFPL3 antisense RNA 1 inhibits the radiotherapy resistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via modulating microRNA-143-5p/homeobox A6 axis.

Authors:  Weifeng Wang; Zhuo Zhang; Yundong Li; Anqi Gu; Yingyin Wang; Yizheng Cai; Yajie Yu; Xiaocong Deng
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Upright epiglottis prevents aspiration in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma post-chemoradiation.

Authors:  Susyana Tamin; Marlinda Adham; Arfan Noer; Nana Supriana; Saptawati Bardosono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Circulating microRNAs as the Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuy Ai Huyen Le; Thuan Duc Lao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.141

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.