Literature DB >> 28609204

Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.

Jan C M van Zelst1, Roel D M Mus1, Gwendolyn Woldringh1, Matthieu J C M Rutten1, Peter Bult1, Suzan Vreemann1, Mathijn de Jong1, Nico Karssemeijer1, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge1, Ritse M Mann1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate a multimodal surveillance regimen including yearly full-field digital (FFD) mammography, dynamic contrast agent-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and biannual automated breast (AB) ultrasonography (US) in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter trial enrolled 296 carriers of the BRCA mutation (153 BRCA1 and 128 BRCA2 carriers, and 15 women with first-degree untested relatives) between September 2010 and November 2012, with follow-up until November 2015. Participants underwent 2 years of intensified surveillance including biannual AB US, and routine yearly DCE MR imaging and FFD mammography. The surveillance performance for each modality and possible combinations were determined. Results Breast cancer was screening-detected in 16 women (age range, 33-58 years). Three interval cancers were detected by self-examination, all in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation under age 43 years. One cancer was detected in a carrier of the BRCA1 mutation with a palpable abnormality in the contralateral breast. One incidental breast cancer was detected in a prophylactic mastectomy specimen. Respectively, sensitivity of DCE MR imaging, FFD mammography, and AB US was 68.1% (14 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.9%, 85.8%), 37.2% (eight of 21; 95% CI: 19.8%, 58.7%), and 32.1% (seven of 21; 95% CI: 16.1%, 53.8%); specificity was 95.0% (643 of 682; 95% CI: 92.7%, 96.5%), 98.1% (638 of 652; 95% CI: 96.7%, 98.9%), and 95.1% (1030 of 1088; 95% CI: 93.5%, 96.3%); cancer detection rate was 2.0% (14 of 702), 1.2% (eight of 671), and 1.0% (seven of 711) per 100 women-years; and positive predictive value was 25.2% (14 of 54), 33.7% (nine of 23), and 9.5% (seven of 68). DCE MR imaging and FFD mammography combined yielded the highest sensitivity of 76.3% (16 of 21; 95% CI: 53.8%, 89.9%) and specificity of 93.6% (643 of 691; 95% CI: 91.3%, 95.3%). AB US did not depict additional cancers. FFD mammography yielded no additional cancers in women younger than 43 years, the mean age at diagnosis. In carriers of the BRCA2 mutation, sensitivity of FFD mammography with DCE MR imaging surveillance was 90.9% (10 of 11; 95% CI: 72.7%, 100%) and 60.0% (six of 10; 95% CI: 30.0%, 90.0%) in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation because of the high interval cancer rate in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation. Conclusion AB US may not be of added value to yearly FFD mammography and DCE MR imaging surveillance of carriers of the BRCA mutation. Study results suggest that carriers of the BRCA mutation younger than 40 years may not benefit from FFD mammography surveillance in addition to DCE MR imaging. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609204     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Updated Breast Cancer Surveillance Recommendations for Female Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer From the International Guideline Harmonization Group.

Authors:  Renée L Mulder; Melissa M Hudson; Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Gill Levitt; Louis S Constine; W Hamish Wallace; Flora E van Leeuwen; Cécile M Ronckers; Tara O Henderson; Chaya S Moskowitz; Danielle N Friedman; Andrea K Ng; Helen C Jenkinson; Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt; Roderick Skinner; Leontien C M Kremer; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Yonglan Zheng; Hiroyuki Abe; Kristen Whitaker; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Tom Walsh; David Schacht; Kirti Kulkarni; Deepa Sheth; Marion S Verp; Angela R Bradbury; Jane Churpek; Elias Obeid; Jeffrey Mueller; Galina Khramtsova; Fang Liu; Akila Raoul; Hongyuan Cao; Iris L Romero; Susan Hong; Robert Livingston; Nora Jaskowiak; Xiaoming Wang; Marcio Debiasi; Colin C Pritchard; Mary-Claire King; Gregory Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Dezheng Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening for women at high risk: review of current guidelines from leading specialty societies.

Authors:  Natsuko Onishi; Masako Kataoka
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 4.  Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Vanessa R Blair; Maybelle McLeod; Fátima Carneiro; Daniel G Coit; Johanna L D'Addario; Jolanda M van Dieren; Kirsty L Harris; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Carla Oliveira; Rachel S van der Post; Julie Arnold; Patrick R Benusiglio; Tanya M Bisseling; Alex Boussioutas; Annemieke Cats; Amanda Charlton; Karen E Chelcun Schreiber; Jeremy L Davis; Massimiliano di Pietro; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; James M Ford; Kimberley Gamet; Irene Gullo; Richard H Hardwick; David G Huntsman; Pardeep Kaurah; Sonia S Kupfer; Andrew Latchford; Paul F Mansfield; Takeshi Nakajima; Susan Parry; Jeremy Rossaak; Haruhiko Sugimura; Magali Svrcek; Marc Tischkowitz; Toshikazu Ushijima; Hidetaka Yamada; Han-Kwang Yang; Adrian Claydon; Joana Figueiredo; Karyn Paringatai; Raquel Seruca; Nicola Bougen-Zhukov; Tom Brew; Simone Busija; Patricia Carneiro; Lynn DeGregorio; Helen Fisher; Erin Gardner; Tanis D Godwin; Katharine N Holm; Bostjan Humar; Caroline J Lintott; Elizabeth C Monroe; Mark D Muller; Enrique Norero; Yasmin Nouri; Joana Paredes; João M Sanches; Emily Schulpen; Ana S Ribeiro; Andrew Sporle; James Whitworth; Liying Zhang; Anthony E Reeve; Parry Guilford
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Breast density implications and supplemental screening.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Kathryn P Lowry; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; J Shannon Swan; Tina Motazedi; Elkan F Halpern; Anna N A Tosteson; G Scott Gazelle; Karen Donelan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic.

Authors:  Anne T Knisely; Martha E Stewart; Christine Garcia; Martha H Thomas; Susan C Modesitt; Kari L Ring
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-05-22

8.  Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

Authors:  Christopher E Comstock; Constantine Gatsonis; Gillian M Newstead; Bradley S Snyder; Ilana F Gareen; Jennifer T Bergin; Habib Rahbar; Janice S Sung; Christina Jacobs; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary H Nicholson; Robert C Ward; Jacqueline Holt; Andrew Prather; Kathy D Miller; Mitchell D Schnall; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 157.335

9.  High rate of occult cancer found in prophylactic mastectomy specimens despite thorough presurgical assessment with MRI and ultrasound: findings from the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Registration 2016 in Japan.

Authors:  Hideko Yamauchi; Megumi Okawa; Shiro Yokoyama; Chizuko Nakagawa; Reiko Yoshida; Koyu Suzuki; Seigo Nakamura; Masami Arai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.

Authors:  Suzan Vreemann; Jan C M van Zelst; Margrethe Schlooz-Vries; Peter Bult; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Nico Karssemeijer; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.