Literature DB >> 28609003

Preanalytic specimen triage: Smears, cell blocks, cytospin preparations, transport media, and cytobanking.

Gilda da Cunha Santos1,2, Mauro A Saieg3.   

Abstract

With increasing requests for the evaluation of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers, great attention must be paid to the preanalytical issues regarding sample quality and DNA/RNA yield from all different types of cytological preparations. The objectives of this review were: 1) to provide an update regarding the importance of specimen triage as well as specimen handling and collection; 2) to discuss the different cell preparations that can be used for molecular testing, their advantages and limitations; and 3) to highlight the strategies for biobanking cytology samples. Good-quality DNA/RNA can be harvested from fresh cells in cell suspensions, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks, archival stained smears, archival unstained cytospin preparations, liquid-based cytology slides, FTA cards, and cryopreserved cells. In contrast to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens (small biopsies and surgical resections), the multitude of types of sample preparations as well as the diversity in sample collection and processing procedures make cytology an ideal specimen for most genomic platforms, with less DNA and RNA degradation and a purer sample, usually with a higher concentration of tumor cells. The broad incorporation of cytological specimens into clinical practice. A should increase the number of samples potentially available for molecular tests and avoid repeat invasive procedures for tissue procurement, thereby increasing patient safety. In this context, it is of utmost importance that cytopathologists become familiar with the variables that can affect test results and embrace the goal of excellence in sample quality. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125(6 suppl):455-64.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell blocks; cryopreservation; cytospin preparation; epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); fine-needle aspiration; liquid-based cytology; molecular cytopathology; preanalytical; sample triage; smears

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609003     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Status Using Cytology Effusion Specimens to Determine Eligibility for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Jacobi; Gene Landon; Russell R Broaddus; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  New Concept and Apparatus for Cytocentrifugation and Cell Processing for Microscopy Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Ligasová; Karel Koberna
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Evaluating Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Status Using Cytology Effusion Specimens to Determine Eligibility for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Jacobi; Gene Landon; Russell R Broaddus; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.686

4.  Comparison of the SuperARMS and ARMS for detecting EGFR mutations in liquid-based cytology specimens from NSCLC patients.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Ziyang Cao; Wei Zhang; Liping Zhang; Likun Hou; Chunyan Wu
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Diagnostic yield and agreement on fine-needle specimens from solid pancreatic lesions : comparing the smear technique to liquid-based cytology.

Authors:  Priscilla A van Riet; Rutger Quispel; Djuna L Cahen; Mieke C Snijders-Kruisbergen; Petri van Loenen; Nicole S Erler; Jan-Werner Poley; Lydi M J W van Driel; Sanna A Mulder; Bart J Veldt; Ivonne Leeuwenburgh; Marie-Paule G F Anten; Pieter Honkoop; Annemieke Y Thijssen; Lieke Hol; Mohammed Hadithi; Claire E Fitzpatrick; Ingrid Schot; Jilling F Bergmann; Abha Bhalla; Marco J Bruno; Katharina Biermann
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-22

6.  Cisplatin Uptake in Macrophage Subtypes at the Single-Cell Level by LA-ICP-TOFMS Imaging.

Authors:  Anna Schoeberl; Michael Gutmann; Sarah Theiner; Martin Schaier; Andreas Schweikert; Walter Berger; Gunda Koellensperger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Evaluation of Cytologic Sample Preparations for Compatibility With Nucleic Acid Analysis.

Authors:  Laure Sorber; Bart Claes; Karen Zwaenepoel; Bieke Van Dorst; Koen De Winne; Els Fransen; Reinier Wener; Therese Lapperre; Filip Lardon; Patrick Pauwels
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.493

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.