Matthew J Maurice1, Jessica M Yih2, John B Ammori3, Robert Abouassaly2,4. 1. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Division of Urology, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The volume-outcome relationship is well recognized. We sought to investigate this relationship in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery. METHODS: Non-metastatic RPS cases from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were analyzed. Hospitals in the top 10th percentile for volume were defined as high-volume. Outcomes were selected a priori based on their known prognostic significance, including surgery use, R0/R1 resection, and R0 resection. Volume-outcome associations were assessed by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 3141 RPS cases identified, 70.0% were managed surgically. Of these, 93.0% were R0/R1 resections, and 67.6% were R0 resections. Surgical management, R0/R1 resection, and R0 resection were each associated with improved overall survival (P < 0.001). Hospital volume was an independent predictor of surgical management, R0 resection, and R0/R1 resection. Patients treated at high-volume centers had 1.9-fold higher odds of undergoing surgical management (P < 0.001), 2.5-fold higher odds of receiving a R0/R1 resection (P = 0.026), and 1.8-fold higher odds of an R0 resection (P < 0.001). Academic setting predicted use of surgical management (P < 0.001) and R0/R1 resection (P = 0.015) but not R0 resection (P = 0.882). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume hospitals are significantly associated with surgery use and improved surgical outcomes. Consideration should be given to further centralization of RPS care.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The volume-outcome relationship is well recognized. We sought to investigate this relationship in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery. METHODS: Non-metastatic RPS cases from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were analyzed. Hospitals in the top 10th percentile for volume were defined as high-volume. Outcomes were selected a priori based on their known prognostic significance, including surgery use, R0/R1 resection, and R0 resection. Volume-outcome associations were assessed by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 3141 RPS cases identified, 70.0% were managed surgically. Of these, 93.0% were R0/R1 resections, and 67.6% were R0 resections. Surgical management, R0/R1 resection, and R0 resection were each associated with improved overall survival (P < 0.001). Hospital volume was an independent predictor of surgical management, R0 resection, and R0/R1 resection. Patients treated at high-volume centers had 1.9-fold higher odds of undergoing surgical management (P < 0.001), 2.5-fold higher odds of receiving a R0/R1 resection (P = 0.026), and 1.8-fold higher odds of an R0 resection (P < 0.001). Academic setting predicted use of surgical management (P < 0.001) and R0/R1 resection (P = 0.015) but not R0 resection (P = 0.882). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume hospitals are significantly associated with surgery use and improved surgical outcomes. Consideration should be given to further centralization of RPS care.
Authors: Sarah B Fisher; Yi-Ju Chiang; Barry W Feig; Janice N Cormier; Kelly K Hunt; Keila E Torres; Christina L Roland Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Emily Z Keung; Yi-Ju Chiang; Janice N Cormier; Keila E Torres; Kelly K Hunt; Barry W Feig; Christina L Roland Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-14 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Richard J Straker; Yun Song; Adrienne B Shannon; Clayton T Marcinak; John T Miura; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sriram Venigalla; Kevin T Nead; Ronnie Sebro; David M Guttmann; Sonam Sharma; Charles B Simone; William P Levin; Robert J Wilson; Kristy L Weber; Jacob E Shabason Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tyler Abarca; Yubo Gao; Varun Monga; Munir R Tanas; Mohammed M Milhem; Benjamin J Miller Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.454