| Literature DB >> 28607841 |
Nan-Chieh Huang1, Wan-Ting Hung2, Wei-Lun Tsai3, Feng-Yi Lai4, You-Sheng Lin5, Mei-Shu Huang5, Jih-Jung Chen6, Wei-Yu Lin7, Jing-Ru Weng8, Tsung-Hsien Chang5,9.
Abstract
Dengue virus types 1-4 (DENV-1-4) are positive-strand RNA viruses with an envelope that belongs to the Flaviviridae. DENV infection threatens human health worldwide. However, other than supportive treatments, no specific therapy is available for the infection. In order to discover novel medicine against DENV, we tested 59 crude extracts, without cytotoxicity, from 23 plants in vitro; immunofluorescence assay revealed that the methanol extracts of fruit, heartwood, leaves and stem from Ficus septica Burm. f. had a promising anti-DENV-1 and DENV-2 effect. However, infection with the non-envelope picornavirus, Aichi virus, was not inhibited by treatment with F. septica extracts. F. septica may be a candidate antiviral drug against an enveloped virus such as DENV.Entities:
Keywords: Aichi virus; Crude extract; Dengue virus; Ficus septica
Year: 2017 PMID: 28607841 PMCID: PMC5466810 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
The IC50 of plant crude extracts against Dengue virus type 2 infection.
| No. | Botanical name | Part of plant | Extract | Abbreviation of crude extract | IC50 (μg/ml) of viral inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole plant | Methanol | Ao-(WP)-M | >100 | ||
| 2 | Root | Methanol | ACM (R)-M | >100 | ||
| 3 | Leaves | Methanol | BP (L)-M | >100 | ||
| 4 | Whole plant | Methanol | CaR-(WP)-M | >100 | ||
| 5 | Leaves | Methanol | Ce-(L)-M | >100 | ||
| 6 | Leaves | Methanol | CiM-(L)-M | >100 | ||
| 7 | Whole plant | Acetone | CO-(WP)-A | >100 | ||
| Whole plant | Methanol | CO-(WP)-M | >100 | |||
| 8 | Leaves | Acetone | EJa-L-A | >100 | ||
| 9 | Leaves | Acetone | ES-(L)-A | >100 | ||
| Leaves | Chloroform | ES-(L)-C | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | ES-(L)-M | >100 | |||
| Stem | Methanol | ES-(S)-M | >100 | |||
| 10 | Leaves | Acetone | FG-(L)-A | >100 | ||
| Leaves | Chloroform | FG-(L)-C | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | FG-(L)-M | >100 | |||
| 11 | Root Bark | Acetone | FS-(RB)-A | |||
| Leaves | Methanol-Ethyl acetate | FS-(L)-M-ET | ||||
| Fruit | Methanol | FS-(F)-M | ||||
| Heartwood | Methanol | FS-(HW)-M | ||||
| Leaves | Acetone | FS-(L)-A | ||||
| Leaves | Chloroform | FS-(L)-C | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | FS-(L)-M | ||||
| Stem | Methanol | FS-(S)-M | ||||
| 12 | Leaves | Acetone | FSVH-(L)-A | 72.04 ± 14.5 | <0.05 | |
| Leaves | Chloroform | FSVH-(L)-C | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | FSVH-(L)-M | >100 | |||
| Stem | Methanol | FSVH-(S)-M | >100 | |||
| 13 | Flower | Methanol | GS-(F)-M | >100 | ||
| 14 | Leaves | Methanol | Lr-(L)-M | >100 | ||
| 15 | Leaves | Acetone | LC-(L)-A | >100 | ||
| Leaves | Chloroform | LC-(L)-C | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | LC-(L)-M | >100 | |||
| Stem | Acetone | LC-(S)-A | >100 | |||
| Stem | Chloorform | LC-(S)-C | >100 | |||
| Stem | Methanol | LC-(S)-M | >100 | |||
| Fruit | Acetone | LC-(FR)-A | >100 | |||
| Pericarp | Acetone | LC-(Peri)-A | >100 | |||
| Pericarp | Methanol | LC-(Peri)-M | >100 | |||
| 16 | Whole plant | Acetone | PA-(WP)-A | >100 | ||
| Whole plant | Chloroform | PA-(WP)-C | >100 | |||
| Whole plant | Methanol | PA-(WP)-M | >100 | |||
| 17 | Whole plant | Methanol | PL -(WP)-M | >100 | ||
| 18 | Whole plant | Methanol | Sa-(WP)-M | >100 | ||
| 19 | Whole plant | Acetone | Scl-(WP)-A | >100 | ||
| Whole plant | Chloroform | Scl-(WP)-C | >100 | |||
| Whole plant | Methanol | Scl-(WP)-M | >100 | |||
| 20 | Whole plant | Methanol | SN-(WP)-M | >100 | ||
| 21 | Leaves | Chloroform | STV-(L)-C | >100 | ||
| Leaves | Methanol | STV-(L)-M | >100 | |||
| Leaves | Acetone | STV-(L)-A | >100 | |||
| 22 | Fruit | Acetone | TT-(Fr)-A | >100 | ||
| Fruit | Methanol | TT-(Fr)-M | >100 | |||
| Fruit | Chloroform | TT-(Fr)-C | >100 | |||
| Fruit | Methanol | TT-(Fr)-M | >100 | |||
| Whole plant | Acetone | TT-(WP)-A | >100 | |||
| Whole plant | Chloroform | TT-(WP)-C | >100 | |||
| Whole plant | Methanol | TT-(WP)-M | >100 | |||
| 23 | Fruit | Chloroform | XS-(Fr)-C | >100 | ||
| Fruit | Methanol | XS-(Fr)-M | >100 |
Notes.
P < 0.05 estimated by 2-tailed Student t test (IC50 vs. Control).
Figure 1Ficus septica leaf methanol extract inhibits DENV infection in various cell types.
(A, C, E and G) A549, HepG2, Huh7.5 and WS1 cells (3 × 104) were incubated with various doses of F. septica leaf methanol extract (FS-(L)-M, 3.125 ∼ 50μg/ml) or DMSO solvent control (Ctrl) for 3 h before dengue virus type I and type II (DENV-1, DENV-2) and Aichi virus (AiV) infection at MOI = 2.5. After 2 h of virus adsorption and 42 h incubation, the immunofluorescence assay was performed to detect the viral infected cells. (B, D, F and G) Fluorescence intensity was measured and quantified by the Li-Cor odyssey CLx imaging system. The IC50 of FS-(L)-M on virus inhibition was indicated. The data are mean ± SD (n = 6). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by two-tailed Student t test.
Figure 2Leaf methanol extract of Ficus septica inhibits enveloped viral infection.
(A) DENV-1, DENV-2 and AiV viral stocks were incubated with various doses of FS-(L)-M for 1 h at room temperature before used to infect A549 cells (3 × 104) at MOI = 2.5. After 2 h of virus adsorption, the virus–compound mixture medium was replaced by fresh growth medium for further 42 h incubation. DENV- or AiV-infected cells were detected by immunofluorescence assay. (B) Fluorescence intensity was measured and quantified by the Li-Cor odyssey CLx imaging system. The data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments. *** P < 0.001 by two-tailed Student t test.