Literature DB >> 28607505

Predictive genetic markers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a long way to go. Review of the literature.

M Gusella1, E Pezzolo1, Y Modena2, C Barile2, D Menon2, G Crepaldi2, F La Russa2, A P Fraccon3, F Pasini3.   

Abstract

The role of genetic molecular markers in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer has been reviewed, focusing strictly on concurrent chemoradiation protocols followed by surgery. Eleven studies evaluated the role of mRNA expression profile; the end point was overall survival (OS) in two studies and different definitions of histological response in nine. Genes reported as significant were involved in cell cycle control (30), apoptosis (7), structural molecules (9), cell metabolism (6) and DNA repair (1). Seven studies reported about 15 microRNA (miRNA) molecules associated with OS (2) or histological response (13), however, defined with different classifications. Their target genes were prevalently involved in cell cycle control (4), apoptosis (1), cell adhesion (1), migration (1) and angiogenesis (1). Gene polymorphisms (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been evaluated in 8 studies reporting 10 variants associated with survival or pathological response. OS was the end point in six of these studies. SNPs reported as significant were involved in DNA repair system (4), detoxification (2), folate metabolism (6), drug efflux (2) and others (2). In a study, a panel including histology, pathological response and five SNPs discriminated two subsets of patients with 5-year survival rates of 79.3% and 26.3% (hazard ratio 6.25, P<0.0001). In another study, combination of stage, grade and 4 miRNAs improved prediction of pathological response (P=10-30). At present, given the great inconsistency of the data and the variability of the end points, definite conclusions are extremely difficult, if not impossible. More consistent data can derive only from analyses obtained from patients included in prospective randomized trials while panels combining genetic and clinical factors may improve prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28607505     DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2017.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  46 in total

1.  Prognostic value of p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, and thymidylate synthase for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  H Shiga; E I Heath; A A Rasmussen; B Trock; P G Johnston; A A Forastiere; M Langmacher; A Baylor; M Lee; K J Cullen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  ERCC1 and XRCC1 gene polymorphisms predict response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ute Warnecke-Eberz; Daniel Vallböhmer; Hakan Alakus; Fabian Kütting; Georg Lurje; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Anke Wienand-Dorweiler; Uta Drebber; Arnulf H Hölscher; Ralf Metzger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Gene expression profiling of localized esophageal carcinomas: association with pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Tsung-Teh Wu; Madan G Luthra; Julie Izzo; Enrique Lopez-Alvarez; Li Zhang; Jaime Bailey; Jeffrey H Lee; Robert Bresalier; Asif Rashid; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms: genomic predictors of clinical response to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy?

Authors:  E Marcuello; A Altés; A Menoyo; E Del Rio; M Baiget
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  MicroRNA expression profiling of esophageal cancer before and after induction chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Augustine Ko; Guan Zehong; Carl Virtanen; Maha Guindi; Thomas K Waddell; Shaf Keshavjee; Gail E Darling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Comparison of two human ovarian carcinoma cell lines (A2780/CP70 and MCAS) that are equally resistant to platinum, but differ at codon 118 of the ERCC1 gene.

Authors:  J J Yu; K B Lee; C Mu; Q Li; T V Abernathy; F Bostick-Bruton; E Reed
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  The T393C polymorphism of the G alpha s gene (GNAS1) is a novel prognostic marker in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ulrich H Frey; Andreas Eisenhardt; Gerd Lümmen; Herbert Rübben; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Kurt W Schmid; Winfried Siffert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis.

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; R Metzger; U Drebber; S Baldus; D Vallböhmer; M Kocher; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Gene expression analysis of diagnostic biopsies predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Stephen G Maher; Charles M Gillham; Shane P Duggan; Paul C Smyth; Nicola Miller; Cian Muldoon; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Orla M Sheils; Donal Hollywood; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  TAK1-regulated expression of BIRC3 predicts resistance to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  G Piro; S Giacopuzzi; M Bencivenga; C Carbone; G Verlato; M Frizziero; M Zanotto; M M Mina; V Merz; R Santoro; A Zanoni; G De Manzoni; G Tortora; D Melisi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Fountoulakis; John Souglakos; Louiza Vini; Gerasimos N Douridas; Anna Koumarianou; Panteleimon Kountourakis; Christos Agalianos; Andreas Alexandrou; Christos Dervenis; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Nikolaos Gouvas; Maria-Angeliki Kalogeridi; Georgia Levidou; Theodoros Liakakos; Joseph Sgouros; Spiros N Sgouros; Charikleia Triantopoulou; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 2.  The predictive value of microRNAs for pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dong Lin; Xiaosang Chen; Lijie Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.