Literature DB >> 16344314

Gene expression profiling of localized esophageal carcinomas: association with pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation.

Rajyalakshmi Luthra1, Tsung-Teh Wu, Madan G Luthra, Julie Izzo, Enrique Lopez-Alvarez, Li Zhang, Jaime Bailey, Jeffrey H Lee, Robert Bresalier, Asif Rashid, Stephen G Swisher, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with localized esophageal carcinoma have a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%. Patients are often treated similarly (ie, with preoperative chemoradiotherapy) but the outcomes vary greatly. Chemoradiotherapy and surgery can result in significant undesirable consequences. Currently, however, there are no tools to help select optimum therapy. We hypothesized that gene expression profiling could provide clues and biomarkers for selection of therapy.
METHODS: Pretreatment endoscopic cancer biopsies from 19 patients (16 with adenocarcinoma, two with squamous cell carcinoma, and one with adenosquamous carcinoma) enrolled onto a preoperative chemoradiotherapy protocol were profiled using oligonucleotide microarrays. Surgical specimens following therapy were assessed for the degree of pathologic response. On the basis of array data, selected genes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis segregated the cancers into two molecular subtypes, each consisting 10 and nine specimens, respectively. Most cancers (five of six) that had pathologic complete response (pathCR) clustered in molecular subtype I. Subtype II, with one exception, consisted cancers that had less than pathCR (< pathCR). Using a combination marker approach, levels of PERP, S100A2, and SPRR3 allowed discrimination of pathCR from < pathCR with high sensitivity and specificity (85%). Pathway analysis identified apoptotic pathway as one of the key functions downregulated in molecular type II in comparison with type I.
CONCLUSION: These encouraging, albeit preliminary, data suggest that expression profiling may distinguish cancers with different pathologic outcome. This is the first report to show subtypes of esophageal cancers with distinct molecular signatures. The potential of PERP, S100A2, and SPRR3 as biomarkers of pathCR warrants further validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344314     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

1.  Low expression of IGFBP-3 predicts poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Li-Ru He; Rui Zhang; Mu-Yan Cai; Yi-Ji Liao; Dong Qian; Mian Xi; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie; Meng-Zhong Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Barrett's Esophagus: A Review of Biology and Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Panteleimon Kountourakis; Jaffer A Ajani; Marta Davila; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Julie G Izzo
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03

3.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

4.  [Response prediction--early response evaluation. Consequences for surgical oncology].

Authors:  J R Siewert; F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Towards an optimal treatment strategy for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Gallego Plazas; Vanesa Pons Sanz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Genome-wide methylation analysis shows similar patterns in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Enping Xu; Jian Gu; Ernest T Hawk; Kenneth K Wang; Maode Lai; Maosheng Huang; Jaffer Ajani; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  A nomogram that predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation also predicts survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Jingya Wang; Pamela K Allen; Arlene M Correa; Dipen M Maru; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Zhongxing Liao; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 8.  cDNA microarray analysis of esophageal cancer: discoveries and prospects.

Authors:  Yutaka Shimada; Fumiaki Sato; Kazuharu Shimizu; Gozoh Tsujimoto; Kazuhiro Tsukada
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-14

Review 9.  Predictive genetic markers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a long way to go. Review of the literature.

Authors:  M Gusella; E Pezzolo; Y Modena; C Barile; D Menon; G Crepaldi; F La Russa; A P Fraccon; F Pasini
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Loss of the p53/p63 regulated desmosomal protein Perp promotes tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Veronica G Beaudry; Dadi Jiang; Rachel L Dusek; Eunice J Park; Stevan Knezevich; Katie Ridd; Hannes Vogel; Boris C Bastian; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.