Literature DB >> 28606390

Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs.

Rebecca C Deagle1, Tse-Luen Erika Wee1, Claire M Brown2.   

Abstract

Light microscopy has grown to be a valuable asset in both the physical and life sciences. It is a highly quantitative method available in individual research laboratories and often centralized in core facilities. However, although quantitative microscopy is becoming a customary tool in research, it is rarely standardized. To achieve accurate quantitative microscopy data and reproducible results, three levels of standardization must be considered: (1) aspects of the microscope, (2) the sample, and (3) the detector. The accuracy of the data is only as reliable as the imaging system itself, thereby imposing the need for routine standard performance testing. Depending on the task some maintenance procedures should be performed once a month, some before each imaging session, while others conducted annually. This text should be implemented as a resource for researchers to integrate with their own standard operating procedures to ensure the highest quality quantitative microscopy data.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Calibration; Microscopy; Quantitative; Standardize

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28606390     DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 1357-2725            Impact factor:   5.085


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the standardization of fluorescence microscopy for quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-16

2.  Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics.

Authors:  Orestis Faklaris; Leslie Bancel-Vallée; Aurélien Dauphin; Baptiste Monterroso; Perrine Frère; David Geny; Tudor Manoliu; Sylvain de Rossi; Fabrice P Cordelières; Damien Schapman; Roland Nitschke; Julien Cau; Thomas Guilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.077

3.  Towards community-driven metadata standards for light microscopy: tiered specifications extending the OME model.

Authors:  Mathias Hammer; Maximiliaan Huisman; Alessandro Rigano; Ulrike Boehm; James J Chambers; Nathalie Gaudreault; Alison J North; Jaime A Pimentel; Damir Sudar; Peter Bajcsy; Claire M Brown; Alexander D Corbett; Orestis Faklaris; Judith Lacoste; Alex Laude; Glyn Nelson; Roland Nitschke; Farzin Farzam; Carlas S Smith; David Grunwald; Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 47.990

4.  Quantitative Evaluation of the Sarcomere Network of Human hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes Using Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy.

Authors:  Heiko Lemcke; Anna Skorska; Cajetan Immanuel Lang; Lisa Johann; Robert David
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  IntensityCheck - The light measuring app for microscope performance checks and consistent fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Dirk Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using the NoiSee workflow to measure signal-to-noise ratios of confocal microscopes.

Authors:  Alexia Ferrand; Kai D Schleicher; Nikolaus Ehrenfeuchter; Wolf Heusermann; Oliver Biehlmaier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Optimization of Advanced Live-Cell Imaging through Red/Near-Infrared Dye Labeling and Fluorescence Lifetime-Based Strategies.

Authors:  Magalie Bénard; Damien Schapman; Christophe Chamot; Fatéméh Dubois; Guénaëlle Levallet; Hitoshi Komuro; Ludovic Galas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.