Literature DB >> 28605411

Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error.

Jeffrey A Boatman1, David M Vock1, Joseph S Koopmeiners1, Eric C Donny2.   

Abstract

Noncompliance or non-adherence to randomized treatment is a common challenge when interpreting data from randomized clinical trials. The effect of an intervention if all participants were forced to comply with the assigned treatment (i.e., the causal effect) is often of primary scientific interest. For example, in trials of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes, policymakers are interested in their effect on smoking behavior if their use were to be compelled by regulation. A variety of statistical methods to estimate the causal effect of an intervention have been proposed, but these methods, including inverse probability of compliance weighted (IPCW) estimators, assume that participants' compliance statuses are reported without error. This is an untenable assumption when compliance is based on self-report. Biomarkers (e.g., nicotine levels in the urine) may provide more reliable indicators of compliance but cannot perfectly discriminate between compliers and non-compliers. However, by modeling the distribution of the biomarker as a mixture distribution and writing the probability of compliance as a function of the mixture components, we show how the probability of compliance can be directly estimated from the data even when compliance status is unknown. To estimate the causal effect, we develop a new approach which re-weights participants by the product of their probability of compliance given the observed data and the inverse probability of compliance given confounders. We show that our proposed estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal and show that in some situations the proposed approach is more efficient than standard IPCW estimators. We demonstrate via simulation that the proposed estimator achieves smaller bias and greater efficiency than ad hoc approaches to estimating the causal effect when compliance is measured with error. We apply our method to data from a recently completed randomized trial of VLNC cigarettes.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causal inference; Clinical trials; Inverse probability weighting; Noncompliance; Regulatory science; Very low nicotine content cigarettes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28605411      PMCID: PMC6075374          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  13 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Rachel L Denlinger; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Ryan G Vandrey; Mustafa al'Absi; Steven G Carmella; Paul M Cinciripini; Sarah S Dermody; David J Drobes; Stephen S Hecht; Joni Jensen; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; F Joseph McClernon; Ivan D Montoya; Sharon E Murphy; Jason D Robinson; Maxine L Stitzer; Andrew A Strasser; Hilary Tindle; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Biochemical estimation of noncompliance with smoking of very low nicotine content cigarettes.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Natalie Nardone; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death.

Authors:  Lauren E Cain; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Nicotine and Anatabine Exposure from Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Authors:  Rachel L Denlinger; Tracy T Smith; Sharon E Murphy; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Lauren R Pacek; Cirielle Colino; Samantha N Cwalina; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Impact of Exclusive Use of Very Low Nicotine Cigarettes on Compensatory Smoking: An Inpatient Crossover Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Matthew J Carpenter; Tracy T Smith; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Cassidy M White; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Lauren R Pacek; Víctor R De Jesús; Lanqing Wang; Clifford Watson; Benjamin C Blount; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Effects of immediate versus gradual nicotine reduction in cigarettes on biomarkers of biological effects.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Xianghua Luo; Alisa K Heskin; Mei Kuen Tang; Steven G Carmella; Joni Jensen; Jason D Robinson; Ryan Vandrey; David J Drobes; Andrew A Strasser; Mustafa al'Absi; Scott Leischow; Paul M Cinciripini; Joseph Koopmeiners; Joshua Ikuemonisan; Neal L Benowitz; Eric C Donny; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  A fully Bayesian mixture model approach for identifying noncompliance in a regulatory tobacco clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexander M Kaizer; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Boatman; David M Vock; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Standardized classification and framework for reporting, interpreting, and analysing medication non-adherence in cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Non-adherence Academic Research Consortium (NARC).

Authors:  Marco Valgimigli; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Bernard Vrijens; Pascal Vranckx; Eugène P McFadden; Francesco Costa; Karen Pieper; David M Vock; Min Zhang; Gerrit-Anne Van Es; Pierluigi Tricoci; Usman Baber; Gabriel Steg; Gilles Montalescot; Dominick J Angiolillo; Patrick W Serruys; Andrew Farb; Stephan Windecker; Adnan Kastrati; Antonio Colombo; Fausto Feres; Peter Jüni; Gregg W Stone; Deepak L Bhatt; Roxana Mehran; Jan G P Tijssen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Detecting participant noncompliance across multiple time points by modeling a longitudinal biomarker.

Authors:  Ross L Peterson; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Tracy T Smith; Sharon E Murphy; Eric C Donny; David M Vock
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.599

7.  Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; Allison M Glasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  The Importance of Estimating Causal Effects for Evaluating a Nicotine Standard for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; David M Vock; Jeffrey A Boatman; Dana Carroll; Suzanne M Colby; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Xianghua Luo; Jennifer W Tidey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.