| Literature DB >> 28604665 |
S Terakura1, Y Kuwatsuka2, S Yamasaki3, A Wake4,5, J Kanda6, Y Inamoto7, S Mizuta8, T Yamaguchi9, N Uchida5,10, Y Kouzai11, N Aotsuka12, H Ogawa13, H Kanamori14, K Nishiwaki15, S Miyakoshi16, M Onizuka17, I Amano18, T Fukuda7, T Ichinohe19, Y Atsuta20,21, M Murata1, T Teshima22.
Abstract
To investigate better GVHD prophylaxis in reduced intensity conditioning umbilical cord blood transplantation (RIC-UCBT), we compared transplant outcomes after UCBT among GvHD prophylaxes using the registry data. We selected patients transplanted for AML or ALL with a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate (MTX)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination. A total of 748 first RIC-UCBT between 2000 and 2012 (MTX+ group, 446, MMF+ group, 302) were included. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet counts higher than 50 000/μL was significantly better in the MMF+ group (relative risk (RR), 1.55; P<0.001: RR, 1.34; P=0.003, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the risk of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GvHD was significantly higher in the MMF+ group than in the MTX+ group (RR, 1.75; P<0.001: RR, 1.97; P=0.004, respectively). In disease-specific analyses of AML, the risk of relapse of high-risk disease was significantly lower in the MMF+ group (RR, 0.69; P=0.009), whereas no significant difference was observed in the risk of relapse-free and overall survival in high-risk disease. In patients with standard-risk disease, no significant differences were noted in the risk of relapse or survival between the MTX+ and MMF+ groups. Collectively, these results suggest that MMF-containing prophylaxis may be preferable in RIC-UCBT, particularly for high-risk disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28604665 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2017.116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483