| Literature DB >> 36195679 |
Kazuki Sakatoku1, Sung-Won Kim2, Hiroshi Okamura1, Minoru Kanaya3,4, Koji Kato5, Satoshi Yamasaki6, Naoyuki Uchida7, Hikaru Kobayashi8, Takahiro Fukuda9, Nobuyuki Takayama10, Jun Ishikawa11, Hideyuki Nakazawa12, Masatoshi Sakurai13, Takashi Ikeda14, Tadakazu Kondo15, Satoshi Yoshioka16, Toshihiro Miyamoto5, Takafumi Kimura17, Tatsuo Ichinohe18, Yoshiko Atsuta19,20, Eisei Kondo21.
Abstract
We evaluated 413 adult patients with lymphoma who underwent unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) with fludarabine and melphalan (FM)-based reduced-intensity conditioning between 2002 and 2017 to investigate longitudinal changes in outcomes and the optimal melphalan dose and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen. Outcomes were compared between FM80/100 (melphalan dose: 80 or 100 mg/m2) and FM140 (melphalan dose: 140 mg/m2), as well as between calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus methotrexate (MTX), CNI plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and CNI alone. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates improved over time (OS: 27% in 2000s vs. 42% in 2010s, p < 0.001; NRM: 43% in 2000s vs. 26% in 2010s, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that in the 2000s, melphalan dose and GVHD prophylaxis regimen did not affect any outcomes. In the 2010s, FM80/100 (vs. FM140) related to better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p = 0.01) and NRM (HR 0.52, p = 0.016). MTX + CNI and CNI alone (vs. CNI + MMF) related to worse OS (CNI + MTX, HR 2.01, p < 0.001; CNI alone, HR 2.65, p < 0.001) and relapse/progression (CNI + MTX, HR 2.40, p < 0.001; CNI alone, HR 2.13, p = 0.023). In recent years, the use of FM80/100 and CNI + MMF significantly reduced the risk of NRM and relapse/progression, respectively, and resulted in better OS after UCBT for lymphoma.Entities:
Keywords: Cord blood transplantation; Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis; Lymphoma; Melphalan dose; Reduced-intensity conditioning
Year: 2022 PMID: 36195679 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04990-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 4.030