Literature DB >> 28604187

In vitro digital subtraction angiographic evaluation of flow diverters in a patient-specific aneurysm.

Liang-Der Jou1.   

Abstract

Background The importance of both porosity and pore density of a flow diverter is well recognized in treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, understanding of the effect of individual wire (wire number and size) is critical in improving device design and use. Methods A total of 10 multi-layered flow diverters with different wire numbers (32, 48, 56, and 72) and sizes (30, 35, and 40 µm) were implanted into identical patient-specific middle cerebral artery aneurysm models. Digital subtraction angiography was acquired at 30 f/s and X-ray signals at three selected regions of interest were compared to determine the amount of intra-aneurysmal flow. Results Flow reduction ranged from 19% for a high porosity (82%) and low pore density (5 pores/mm2) to nearly 80% for a low porosity (49%) and high pore density (36 pores/mm2). An increase in the wire number from 32 to 72 lowers intra-aneurysmal flow and redirects the flow jet; however, the effect of wire size is not observed. Conclusions In our in vitro angiographic study, flow jet is influenced by the wire number in a device qualitatively; quantitatively, intra-aneurysmal flow is affected by both the porosity and pore density. A 2.5 mm device performs better in flow diversion of a middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm than a 3 mm device with the same wire size and wire number, but thicker wires do not lead to better flow diversion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysms; angiography; flow diverter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28604187      PMCID: PMC5490860          DOI: 10.1177/1591019917694023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  33 in total

1.  The effect of stent porosity and strut shape on saccular aneurysm and its numerical analysis with lattice Boltzmann method.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Kim; Xiaofeng Xu; Joon Sang Lee
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Quantification of arterial flow using digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Odile Bonnefous; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Rafik Ouared; Olivier Brina; Hans Aerts; Roel Hermans; Fred van Nijnatten; Jean Stawiaski; Daniel Ruijters
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Study of parameters for evaluating flow reduction with stents in a sidewall aneurysm phantom model.

Authors:  Chang Ho Yu; Tae Kyu Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.300

4.  Metal coverage ratio of pipeline embolization device for treatment of unruptured aneurysms: Reality check.

Authors:  Liang-Der Jou; Gouthami Chintalapani; Michel E Mawad
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Flow diversion of giant curved sidewall and bifurcation experimental aneurysms with very-low-porosity devices.

Authors:  Tim E Darsaut; Fabrice Bing; Alina Makoyeva; Guylaine Gevry; Igor Salazkin; Jean Raymond
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Flow diverters failing to occlude experimental bifurcation or curved sidewall aneurysms: an in vivo study in canines.

Authors:  Tim E Darsaut; Fabrice Bing; Igor Salazkin; Guylaine Gevry; Jean Raymond
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Flow diverters can occlude aneurysms and preserve arterial branches: a new experimental model.

Authors:  T E Darsaut; F Bing; I Salazkin; G Gevry; J Raymond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment.

Authors:  Y Zhang; W Chong; Y Qian
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 9.  Revolution in aneurysm treatment: flow diversion to cure aneurysms: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Ajay K Wakhloo; Matthew J Gounis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters.

Authors:  Iris Quasar Grunwald; M Kamran; R A Corkill; A L Kühn; I S Choi; S Turnbull; D Dobson; K Fassbender; D Watson; M J Gounis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents.

Authors:  Ronak J Dholakia; Ari D Kappel; Andrew Pagano; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber; David J Fiorella; Chander Sadasivan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Surpass Evolve Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rania Issa; Zahrah Al-Homedi; Dawood Hasan Syed; Waseem Aziz; Basem Al-Omari
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.

Authors:  Andreas Maximilian Frölich; Marie Teresa Nawka; Marielle Ernst; Isabell Frischmuth; Jens Fiehler; Jan-Hendrik Buhk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.