Literature DB >> 28604032

Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.

Roy S Hessels1, Tim H W Cornelissen1, Ignace T C Hooge1, Chantal Kemner1.   

Abstract

A long-standing hypothesis is that humans have a bias for fixating the eye region in the faces of others. Most studies have tested this hypothesis with static images or videos of faces, yet recent studies suggest that the use of such "nonresponsive" stimuli might overlook an influence of social context. The present study addressed whether the bias for fixating the eye region in faces would persist in a situation that allowed for social interaction. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate a setup in which a duo could engage in social interaction while their eye movements were recorded. Here, we show that there is a bias for fixating the eye region of a partner that is physically present. Moreover, we report that the time 1 partner in a duo spends looking at the eyes is a good predictor of how long the other partner looks at the eyes. In Experiment 2, we investigate whether participants attune to the level of eye contact instigated by a partner by having a confederate pose as one of the partners. The confederate was subsequently instructed to either fixate the eyes of the observer or scan the entire face. Gaze behaviour of the confederate did not affect gaze behaviour of the observers. We conclude that there is a bias to fixate the eyes when partners can engage in social interaction. In addition, the amount of time spent looking at the eyes is duo-dependent, but not easily manipulated by instructing the gaze behaviour of 1 partner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28604032     DOI: 10.1037/cep0000113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  8 in total

1.  Reality in a sphere: A direct comparison of social attention in the laboratory and the real world.

Authors:  Jonas D Großekathöfer; Christian Seis; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  A Validation of Automatically-Generated Areas-of-Interest in Videos of a Face for Eye-Tracking Research.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Jeroen S Benjamins; Tim H W Cornelissen; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 3.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

4.  Evaluation of an eye tracking setup for studying visual attention in face-to-face conversations.

Authors:  Antonia Vehlen; Ines Spenthof; Daniel Tönsing; Markus Heinrichs; Gregor Domes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Eye tracking in human interaction: Possibilities and limitations.

Authors:  Niilo V Valtakari; Ignace T C Hooge; Charlotte Viktorsson; Pär Nyström; Terje Falck-Ytter; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-01-06

6.  How to choose the size of facial areas of interest in interactive eye tracking.

Authors:  Antonia Vehlen; William Standard; Gregor Domes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The impact of slippage on the data quality of head-worn eye trackers.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Thiago Santini; Roy S Hessels; Ignace T C Hooge; Enkelejda Kasneci; Marcus Nyström
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06

8.  Implying social interaction and its influence on gaze behavior to the eyes.

Authors:  Gijs A Holleman; Roy S Hessels; Chantal Kemner; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.