Literature DB >> 28602486

Supramacroparticulate PE in 6 different joint endoprostheses localisations: An indicator for PE damage?

Simon Krenn1, Marc Thomsen2, Sylvia Usbeck3, Leslie F Scheuber3, Friedrich Boettner4, Manfred Georg Krukemeyer5, Monika Huber6, Jan Philippe Kretzer7, Thorsten Gehrke8, Veit Krenn9.   

Abstract

In the histopathological particle algorithm polyethylene (PE) particles with maximum lengths of more than 100μm - called PE supramacroparticles - are identified exclusively for knee joint and hip prostheses. However, a definitive characterisation, detection in all joint localisations and a causal clarification of the pathogenesis are lacking. In this study a total of 175 SLIM (synovial-like interface membrane) cases with PE supramacroparticles of knee joint prostheses (n=89), hip joint prostheses (n=44), ankle joint prostheses (n=36) and prostheses in three localisations of the upper extremities (n=6) were systematically investigated. The arithmetic mean of the particle length varied greatly within the prosthesis types. This had a significant positive correlation with the prosthesis lifetime and negative correlation with the date of implantation. It can be concluded that both the lifetime and the time of implantation have an influence on the particle length. The prostheses with supramacroparticulate damage moreover showed a clearly reduced survival rate compared with other data published on the prosthesis lifetime. The material wear therefore could not be attributed solely to the usual fatigue factors. Since loosening of the prostheses, decentring of the PE components or damage to the PE inlay existed in all cases, mechanical dysloading seems to be the most probable cause of PE supramacroparticle genesis. Due to the striking length and for demarcation from PE macroparticles, the term supramacroparticulate PE is proposed for a length of more than 100μm. In the extended histopathological particle algorithm supramacroparticulate PE has been included in the macroparticles category and should be taken into account and interpreted causally in histopathological diagnostics of joint prosthesis failure.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint prostheses; Polyethylene (PE); SLIM; Supramacroparticulate PE; Synovialis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28602486     DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Res Pract        ISSN: 0344-0338            Impact factor:   3.250


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Arthur Vick Prize 2017 of the German Society of Orthopaedic Rheumatology].

Authors:  L Bause; A Niemeier; V Krenn
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  [ARMD reaction patterns in knee arthroplasty : A novel hypothetical mechanism: hingiosis].

Authors:  Niklas Kirchen; Lars Reich; Wenzel Waldstein; Thomas Hopf; Karl-Dieter Heller; Stephan Wienert; Veit Krenn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases : Contribution of pathology to the diagnosis].

Authors:  V Krenn; W Waldstein; A Najm; G Perino; R Gaulke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Molded, Gamma-radiated, Argon-processed Polyethylene Components of Rotating Hinge Knee Megaprostheses Have a Lower Failure Hazard and Revision Rates Than Air-sterilized, Machined, Ram-extruded Bar Stock Components.

Authors:  Ana C Belzarena; Mohammad A Elalfy; Mohamed A Yakoub; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.