A Andriessen1,2, J Apelqvist3, G Mosti2,4, H Partsch2,5, C Gonska6, M Abel2,6,7. 1. Radboud UMC, Nijmegen & Andriessen Consultants, Malden, The Netherlands. 2. International Compression Club (ICC), Berndorf, Austria. 3. Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden. 4. Department of Angiology, Clinica MD Barbantini, Lucca, Italy. 5. Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 6. Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co KG, Rengsdorf, Germany. 7. Patient Outcome Group (POG), European Wound Management Association (EWMA), Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The adequate use of compression in venous leg ulcer treatment is equally important to patients as well as clinicians. Currently, there is a lack of clarity on contraindications, risk factors, adverse events and complications, when applying compression therapy for venous leg ulcer patients. METHODS: The project aimed to optimize prevention, treatment and maintenance approaches by recognizing contraindications, risk factors, adverse events and complications, when applying compression therapy for venous leg ulcer patients. A literature review was conducted of current guidelines on venous leg ulcer prevention, management and maintenance. RESULTS: Searches took place from 29th February 2016 to 30th April 2016 and were prospectively limited to publications in the English and German languages and publication dates were between January 2009 and April 2016. Twenty Guidelines, clinical pathways and consensus papers on compression therapy for venous leg ulcer treatment and for venous disease, were included. Guidelines agreed on the following absolute contraindications: Arterial occlusive disease, heart failure and ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) <0.5, but gave conflicting recommendations on relative contraindications, risks and adverse events. Moreover definitions were unclear and not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidance is needed to inform clinicians on risk factor, adverse effects, complications and contraindications. ABPI values need to be specified and details should be given on the type of compression that is safe to use. Ongoing research challenges the present recommendations, shifting some contraindications into a list of potential indications. Complications of compression can be prevented when adequate assessment is performed and clinicians are skilled in applying compression.
INTRODUCTION: The adequate use of compression in venous leg ulcer treatment is equally important to patients as well as clinicians. Currently, there is a lack of clarity on contraindications, risk factors, adverse events and complications, when applying compression therapy for venous leg ulcerpatients. METHODS: The project aimed to optimize prevention, treatment and maintenance approaches by recognizing contraindications, risk factors, adverse events and complications, when applying compression therapy for venous leg ulcerpatients. A literature review was conducted of current guidelines on venous leg ulcer prevention, management and maintenance. RESULTS: Searches took place from 29th February 2016 to 30th April 2016 and were prospectively limited to publications in the English and German languages and publication dates were between January 2009 and April 2016. Twenty Guidelines, clinical pathways and consensus papers on compression therapy for venous leg ulcer treatment and for venous disease, were included. Guidelines agreed on the following absolute contraindications: Arterial occlusive disease, heart failure and ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) <0.5, but gave conflicting recommendations on relative contraindications, risks and adverse events. Moreover definitions were unclear and not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidance is needed to inform clinicians on risk factor, adverse effects, complications and contraindications. ABPI values need to be specified and details should be given on the type of compression that is safe to use. Ongoing research challenges the present recommendations, shifting some contraindications into a list of potential indications. Complications of compression can be prevented when adequate assessment is performed and clinicians are skilled in applying compression.
Authors: E Rabe; E Földi; H Gerlach; M Jünger; G Lulay; A Miller; K Protz; S Reich-Schupke; T Schwarz; M Stücker; E Valesky; F Pannier Journal: Hautarzt Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 0.751
Authors: Carolina D Weller; Victoria Team; John D Ivory; Kimberley Crawford; Georgina Gethin Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: C D Weller; Victoria Team; Sebastian Probst; Georgina Gethin; Catelyn Richards; Jane Sixsmith; Louise Turnour; Ayoub Bouguettaya Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eberhard Rabe; Hugo Partsch; Nick Morrison; Mark H Meissner; Giovanni Mosti; Christopher R Lattimer; Patrick H Carpentier; Sylvain Gaillard; Michael Jünger; Tomasz Urbanek; Juerg Hafner; Malay Patel; Stephanie Wu; Joseph Caprini; Fedor Lurie; Tobias Hirsch Journal: Phlebology Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 1.740