Literature DB >> 28601334

Variation in readmission expenditures after high-risk surgery.

Bruce L Jacobs1, Chang He2, Benjamin Y Li3, Alex Helfand3, Naveen Krishnan3, Tudor Borza2, Amir A Ghaferi4, Brent K Hollenbeck2, Jonathan E Helm5, Mariel S Lavieri6, Ted A Skolarus7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program reduces payments to hospitals with excess readmissions for three common medical conditions and recently extended its readmission program to surgical patients. We sought to investigate readmission intensity as measured by readmission cost for high-risk surgeries and examine predictors of higher readmission costs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Database to perform a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing major chest (aortic valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, lung resection) and major abdominal (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [open approach], cystectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy) surgery in 2009 and 2010. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model with generalized estimation equations to examine patient and index admission factors associated with readmission costs.
RESULTS: The 30-d readmission rate was 16% for major chest and 22% for major abdominal surgery (P < 0.001). Discharge to a skilled nursing facility was associated with higher readmission costs for both chest (odds ratio [OR]: 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60-2.48) and abdominal surgeries (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.24-2.78). Comorbidities, length of stay, and receipt of blood or imaging was associated with higher readmission costs for chest surgery patients. Readmission >3 wk after discharge was associated with lower costs among abdominal surgery patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions after high-risk surgery are common, affecting about one in six patients. Predictors of higher readmission costs differ among major chest and abdominal surgeries. Better identifying patients susceptible to higher readmission costs may inform future interventions to either reduce the intensity of these readmissions or eliminate them altogether.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Failure to rescue; High-risk surgery; Readmission intensity; Readmissions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28601334      PMCID: PMC5467460          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  25 in total

1.  Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery.

Authors:  Hua-yin Yu; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Keith J Kowalczyk; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Trends in the national outcomes and costs for claudication and limb threatening ischemia: angioplasty vs bypass graft.

Authors:  Teviah Sachs; Frank Pomposelli; Allen Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Marc Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: potential unintended consequences for hospitals serving vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Qian Gu; Lane Koenig; Jennifer Faerberg; Caroline Rossi Steinberg; Christopher Vaz; Mary P Wheatley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The association between hospital care intensity and surgical outcomes in medicare patients.

Authors:  Kyle H Sheetz; Justin B Dimick; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Complications and failure to rescue after laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Jui Tan; J Stuart Wolf; Zaojun Ye; John T Wei; David C Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care.

Authors:  Thomas C Tsai; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Atul A Gawande; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Time-to-readmission and Mortality After High-risk Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew A Gonzalez; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Justin B Dimick; Shantanu Dev; John D Birkmeyer; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Escalation of care in surgery: a systematic risk assessment to prevent avoidable harm in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Maximilian Johnston; Sonal Arora; Oliver Anderson; Dominic King; Nebil Behar; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in Surgery May Disproportionately Affect Minority-serving Hospitals.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Andrew M Ryan; Andrew A Gonzalez; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Predictors of hospital discharge to an extended care facility after major general thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Dustin M Walters; Alykhan S Nagji; George J Stukenborg; Melissa R Peluso; Matthew D Taylor; Benjamin D Kozower; Christine L Lau; David R Jones
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  Time Spent Away from Home in the Year Following High-Risk Cancer Surgery in Older Adults.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Shoujun Zhao; W John Boscardin; Alexander Smith; Emily Finlayson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: is it time for sugammadex to replace neostigmine?

Authors:  M Carron; A De Cassai; G Ieppariello
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  [Reasons analysis on unplanned reoperation of degenerative lumbar spine diseases].

Authors:  Ruihuan Du; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.