IMPORTANCE: Hospitals' care intensity varies widely across the United States. Payers and policy makers have become focused on promoting quality, low-cost, efficient health care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether increased hospital care intensity (HCI) is associated with improved outcomes following major surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using national Medicare data in this retrospective cohort study, we identified 706,520 patients at 2544 hospitals who underwent 1 of 7 major cardiovascular, orthopedic, or general surgical operations. EXPOSURE: The HCI Index, which is validated and publicly available through the Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality, major complication, and failure-to-rescue rates. RESULTS: Hospital care intensity varied 10-fold. High-HCI hospitals had greater rates of major complications when compared with low-HCI centers (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05). There was a decrease in failure to rescue at high compared with low-HCI hospitals (risk ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Using multilevel-models, HCI reduced the variation in failure-to-rescue rates between hospitals by 2.7% after accounting for patient comorbidities and hospital resources. Patients treated at high-HCI hospitals had longer hospitalizations, more inpatient deaths, and lower hospice use during the last 2 years of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Failure-to-rescue rates were lower at high-care intensity hospitals. Conversely, care intensity explains a very small proportion of variation in failure-to-rescue rates across hospitals.
IMPORTANCE: Hospitals' care intensity varies widely across the United States. Payers and policy makers have become focused on promoting quality, low-cost, efficient health care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether increased hospital care intensity (HCI) is associated with improved outcomes following major surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using national Medicare data in this retrospective cohort study, we identified 706,520 patients at 2544 hospitals who underwent 1 of 7 major cardiovascular, orthopedic, or general surgical operations. EXPOSURE: The HCI Index, which is validated and publicly available through the Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality, major complication, and failure-to-rescue rates. RESULTS: Hospital care intensity varied 10-fold. High-HCI hospitals had greater rates of major complications when compared with low-HCI centers (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05). There was a decrease in failure to rescue at high compared with low-HCI hospitals (risk ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Using multilevel-models, HCI reduced the variation in failure-to-rescue rates between hospitals by 2.7% after accounting for patient comorbidities and hospital resources. Patients treated at high-HCI hospitals had longer hospitalizations, more inpatient deaths, and lower hospice use during the last 2 years of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Failure-to-rescue rates were lower at high-care intensity hospitals. Conversely, care intensity explains a very small proportion of variation in failure-to-rescue rates across hospitals.
Authors: J Madison Hyer; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Anghela Z Paredes; Kota Sahara; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Bruce L Jacobs; Chang He; Benjamin Y Li; Alex Helfand; Naveen Krishnan; Tudor Borza; Amir A Ghaferi; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jonathan E Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Ted A Skolarus Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Hemalkumar B Mehta; Francesca Dimou; Deepak Adhikari; Nina P Tamirisa; Eric Sieloff; Taylor P Williams; Yong-Fang Kuo; Taylor S Riall Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Michael J Nabozny; Amber E Barnato; Paul J Rathouz; Jeffrey A Havlena; Amy J Kind; William J Ehlenbach; Qianqian Zhao; Katie Ronk; Maureen A Smith; Caprice C Greenberg; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Samir K Shah; Adoma Manful; Amanda J Reich; Robert S Semco; Jennifer Tjia; Keren Ladin; Joel S Weissman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Zhimeng Jia; Richard E Leiter; Justin J Sanders; Donald R Sullivan; Pedro Gozalo; Jennifer N Bunker; Joan M Teno Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthew Gordon Crowson; Jason A Beyea; Justin Cottrell; Faisal Karmali; Giovanni Lampasona; James E Saunders; Richard F Lewis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 4.135