Literature DB >> 28601305

Survival benefits of remote ischemic conditioning in sepsis.

Bellal Joseph1, Mazhar Khalil2, Ammar Hashmi2, Louise Hecker2, Narong Kulvatunyou2, Andrew Tang2, Randall S Friese2, Peter Rhee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis remains the leading cause of death in the surgical intensive care unit. Prior studies have demonstrated a survival benefit of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in many disease states. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of RIC on survival in sepsis in an animal model and to assess alterations in inflammatory biochemical profiles. We hypothesized that RIC alters inflammatory biochemical profiles resulting in decreased mortality in a septic mouse model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight to 12 week C57BL/6 mice received intra-peritoneal injection of 12.5-mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Septic animals in the experimental group underwent RIC at 0, 2, and 6 h after LPS by surgical exploration and alternate clamping of the femoral artery. Six 4-min cycles of ischemia-reperfusion were performed. Primary outcome was survival at 5-d after LPS injection. Secondary outcome was to assess the following serum cytokine levels: interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-10, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factoralpha (TNFα) at the baseline before LPS injection, 0 hour after LPS injection, and at 2, 4, 24 hours after induction of sepsis (RIC was performed at 2 h after LPS injection). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used. ANOVA test was used to compare cytokine measurements.
RESULTS: We performed experiments on 44 mice: 14 sham and 30 RIC mice (10 at each time point). Overall survival was higher in the experimental group compared to the sham group (57% versus 21%; P = 0.02), with the highest survival rate observed in the 2-hour post-RIC group (70%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 2-h post-RIC group had increased survival at 5 days after LPS (P = 0.04) with hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.98). In the RIC group, serum concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1β, and TNFα peaked at 2 h after LPS and then decreased significantly over 24 hours (P < 0.0001) compared to the baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: RIC improves survival in sepsis and has the potential for implementation in the clinical practice. Early implementation of RIC may play an immune-modulatory role in sepsis. Further studies are necessary to refine understanding of the observed survival benefits and its implications in sepsis management.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inflammatory markers; Interleukin; Lipopolysaccharide; Remote ischemic conditioning; Sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28601305     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

1.  Remote ischemic conditioning in septic shock: the RECO-Sepsis randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Martin Cour; Kada Klouche; Bertrand Souweine; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Carole Schwebel; Sophie Perinel; Camille Amaz; Marielle Buisson; Michel Ovize; Nathan Mewton; Laurent Argaud
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 41.787

Review 2.  Does remote ischaemic conditioning reduce inflammation? A focus on innate immunity and cytokine response.

Authors:  Lucie Pearce; Sean M Davidson; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Effects of remote ischemic conditioning on microcirculatory alterations in patients with sepsis: a single-arm clinical trial.

Authors:  Inga Kiudulaite; Egle Belousoviene; Astra Vitkauskiene; Andrius Pranskunas
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning in the Prevention for Stroke-Associated Pneumonia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Bowei Zhang; Wenbo Zhao; Hongrui Ma; Yunzhou Zhang; Ruiwen Che; Tingting Bian; Heli Yan; Jiali Xu; Lin Wang; Wantong Yu; Jia Liu; Haiqing Song; Jiangang Duan; Hong Chang; Qingfeng Ma; Qian Zhang; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  RIC in COVID-19-a Clinical Trial to Investigate Whether Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) Can Prevent Deterioration to Critical Care in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Sean M Davidson; Kishal Lukhna; Diana A Gorog; Alan D Salama; Alejandro Rosell Castillo; Sara Giesz; Pelin Golforoush; Siavash Beikoghli Kalkhoran; Sandrine Lecour; Aqeela Imamdin; Helison R P do Carmo; Ticiane Gonçalez Bovi; Mauricio W Perroud; Mpiko Ntsekhe; Andrei C Sposito; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.