Literature DB >> 33629195

Does remote ischaemic conditioning reduce inflammation? A focus on innate immunity and cytokine response.

Lucie Pearce1, Sean M Davidson1, Derek M Yellon2.   

Abstract

The benefits of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) have been difficult to translate to humans, when considering traditional outcome measures, such as mortality and heart failure. This paper reviews the recent literature of the anti-inflammatory effects of RIC, with a particular focus on the innate immune response and cytokine inhibition. Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, the inflammatory hypothesis of cardiac protection is an attractive target on which to re-purpose such novel therapies. A PubMed/MEDLINE™ search was performed on July 13th 2020, for the key terms RIC, cytokines, the innate immune system and inflammation. Data suggest that RIC attenuates inflammation in animals by immune conditioning, cytokine inhibition, cell survival and the release of anti-inflammatory exosomes. It is proposed that RIC inhibits cytokine release via a reduction in nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB)-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome production. In vivo, RIC attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine release in myocardial/cerebral infarction and LPS models of endotoxaemia. In the latter group, cytokine inhibition is associated with a profound survival benefit. Further clinical trials should establish whether the benefits of RIC in inflammation can be observed in humans. Moreover, we must consider whether uncomplicated MI and elective surgery are the most suitable clinical conditions in which to test this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokines; Inflammation; Myocardial infarction; Remote ischaemic conditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33629195      PMCID: PMC7904035          DOI: 10.1007/s00395-021-00852-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8428            Impact factor:   17.165


  158 in total

Review 1.  The Future of Cardioprotection-Pointing Toward Patients at Elevated Risk as the Target Populations.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Seven consecutive days of remote ischaemic preconditioning improves cutaneous vasodilatory capacity in young adults.

Authors:  James A Lang; Jahyun Kim; Warren D Franke; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  HIF-1α and paradoxical phenomena in cardioprotection.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 4.  Innate immune response to viral infection.

Authors:  Shohei Koyama; Ken J Ishii; Cevayir Coban; Shizuo Akira
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 5.  Reperfusion injury salvage kinase signalling: taking a RISK for cardioprotection.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Remote ischemic preconditioning improves the cognitive function of elderly patients following colon surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhenqiu He; Nan Xu; Sihua Qi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Components Associate with Infarct Size, Ventricular Function, and Clinical Outcome in STEMI.

Authors:  Ragnhild Helseth; Christian Shetelig; Geir Øystein Andersen; Miriam Sjåstad Langseth; Shanmuganathan Limalanathan; Trine B Opstad; Harald Arnesen; Pavel Hoffmann; Jan Eritsland; Ingebjørg Seljeflot
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  Adrenomedullin serves a role in the humoral pathway of delayed remote ischemic preconditioning via a hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-associated mechanism.

Authors:  Wenpei Dong; Ping Yu; Tielong Zhang; Chenzhuang Zhu; Jun Qi; Junhao Liang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 9.  Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: Multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Sang-Bing Ong; Sauri Hernández-Reséndiz; Gustavo E Crespo-Avilan; Regina T Mukhametshina; Xiu-Yi Kwek; Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 10.  Current Status of Septic Cardiomyopathy: Basic Science and Clinical Progress.

Authors:  Huan Lin; Wenting Wang; Madeline Lee; Qinghe Meng; Hongsheng Ren
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.810

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial remote ischemic preconditioning: from cell biology to clinical application.

Authors:  Martín Donato; Ricardo J Gelpi; Eliana P Bin; Verónica D Annunzio
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Remote ischaemic conditioning: defining critical criteria for success-report from the 11th Hatter Cardiovascular Workshop.

Authors:  R M Bell; M Basalay; H E Bøtker; S Beikoghli Kalkhoran; R D Carr; J Cunningham; S M Davidson; T J England; S Giesz; A K Ghosh; P Golforoush; A V Gourine; D J Hausenloy; G Heusch; B Ibanez; P Kleinbongard; S Lecour; K Lukhna; M Ntsekhe; M Ovize; A D Salama; G Vilahur; J M Walker; D M Yellon
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.416

3.  Remote ischemic conditioning in septic shock: the RECO-Sepsis randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Martin Cour; Kada Klouche; Bertrand Souweine; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Carole Schwebel; Sophie Perinel; Camille Amaz; Marielle Buisson; Michel Ovize; Nathan Mewton; Laurent Argaud
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 41.787

4.  Qingwenzhike Prescription Alleviates Acute Lung Injury Induced by LPS via Inhibiting TLR4/NF-kB Pathway and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation.

Authors:  Cai Zhang; Xinran Wang; Chunguo Wang; Cheng He; Quantao Ma; Jialin Li; Weiling Wang; Yan-Tong Xu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Chronic Limb Remote Ischemic Conditioning may have an Antihypertensive Effect in Patients with Hypertension.

Authors:  Wenting Guo; Changhong Ren; Bowei Zhang; Wenbo Zhao; Yu Gao; Wantong Yu; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 6.  Innate Lymphoid Cells and Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Wenling Yang; Jibin Lin; Jin Zhou; Yuqi Zheng; Shijiu Jiang; Shaolin He; Dazhu Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  RIC in COVID-19-a Clinical Trial to Investigate Whether Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) Can Prevent Deterioration to Critical Care in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Sean M Davidson; Kishal Lukhna; Diana A Gorog; Alan D Salama; Alejandro Rosell Castillo; Sara Giesz; Pelin Golforoush; Siavash Beikoghli Kalkhoran; Sandrine Lecour; Aqeela Imamdin; Helison R P do Carmo; Ticiane Gonçalez Bovi; Mauricio W Perroud; Mpiko Ntsekhe; Andrei C Sposito; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.947

Review 8.  Exosomes Regulate NLRP3 Inflammasome in Diseases.

Authors:  Zhangwang Li; Xinyue Chen; Junjie Tao; Ao Shi; Jing Zhang; Peng Yu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 9.  Immune Modulation as a Key Mechanism for the Protective Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning After Stroke.

Authors:  Sima Abbasi-Habashi; Glen C Jickling; Ian R Winship
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  miRNA-146a Mimic Inhibits NOX4/P38 Signalling to Ameliorate Mouse Myocardial Ischaemia Reperfusion (I/R) Injury.

Authors:  Lili Xiao; Yulei Gu; Gaofei Ren; Linlin Chen; Liming Liu; Xiaofang Wang; Lu Gao
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.