Literature DB >> 28600449

Regional differences in use of endoscopic ultrasonography in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Paul D James1, Mae Hegagi1, Lilia Antonova1, Jill Tinmouth1, Steven J Heitman1, Carmine Simone1, Elaine Yeung1, Elaine Yong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a safe and accurate modality for evaluating and managing hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal conditions (malignant and nonmalignant); its use is increasing. The aim of this study was to describe regional trends in the use of endoscopic ultrasonography in Ontario.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using health administrative databases. We identified all patients who underwent an endoscopic ultrasound procedure in Ontario from 2003 to 2011 using physician billing data. Patient, physician and institution characteristics were examined. The primary outcome was use of endoscopic ultrasonography.
RESULTS: We identified 9076 endoscopic ultrasound procedures performed in 8001 patients (3858 women [48.2%]; median patient age at first procedure 59 years). A total of 3066 procedures (33.8%) involved fine-needle aspiration. Use of endoscopic ultrasonography increased 17-fold over the study period. In 2011, people living in the health region with the highest rate of use of endoscopic ultrasonography were more than 4 times more likely to undergo the procedure than people living in the health region with the lowest rate of use (standardized rate 61.6 v. 12.9 per 100 000). About 7 in 10 endoscopic ultrasound procedures were performed in an academic institution or regional cancer centre. All 17 endoscopists performing endoscopic ultrasonography during the study period practised in urban areas.
INTERPRETATION: Although the use of endoscopic ultrasonography increased over time in Ontario, there were marked regional differences in use. Provincial needs- and evidence-based initiatives may be needed to narrow the regional gaps in provision of endoscopic ultrasound services in the province. Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28600449      PMCID: PMC5498178          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  30 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound advances, part 1: diagnosis.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kajsa E Affolter; Robert L Schmidt; Anna P Matynia; Douglas G Adler; Rachel E Factor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Avoidable mortality by neighbourhood income in Canada: 25 years after the establishment of universal health insurance.

Authors:  Paul D James; Russell Wilkins; Allan S Detsky; Peter Tugwell; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Administrative data accurately identified intensive care unit admissions in Ontario.

Authors:  Damon C Scales; Jun Guan; Claudio M Martin; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the Johns Hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Utilization of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; David J Vanness; Caprice C Greenberg; Jeff A Havlena; Noelle K LoConte; Jennifer M Weiss; Heather B Neuman; Glen Leverson; Maureen A Smith; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology necessary?

Authors:  P Thomas Cherian; Prasoon Mohan; Abdel Douiri; Philippe Taniere; Rahul K Hejmadi; Brinder S Mahon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Systematic review of the impact of endoscopic ultrasound on the management of patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne M Dyer; Dane B Levison; Robert Y Chen; Sarah J Lord; Stephen Blamey
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Identifying cases of congestive heart failure from administrative data: a validation study using primary care patient records.

Authors:  S E Schultz; D M Rothwell; Z Chen; K Tu
Journal:  Chronic Dis Inj Can       Date:  2013-06

10.  Endoscopic Ultrasound for Preoperative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lin-Na Luo; Long-Jun He; Xiao-Yan Gao; Xin-Xin Huang; Hong-Bo Shan; Guang-Yu Luo; Yin Li; Shi-Yong Lin; Guo-Bao Wang; Rong Zhang; Guo-Liang Xu; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence of intellectual and developmental disabilities among first generation adult newcomers, and the health and health service use of this group: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Durbin; James K H Jung; Hannah Chung; Elizabeth Lin; Robert Balogh; Yona Lunsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Collaboration of community hospital endosonographers improves diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Lydi M J W van Driel; Pieter Honkoop; Mohamad Hadithi; Marie-Paule Anten; Frank Smedts; Margreet C Kerkmeer; Bart J Veldt; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-06-12

3.  Evidence-based recommendations for establishing and implementing an EUS program: Recommendations for sustainable success and improved clinical outcomes across the continuum of care.

Authors:  Anand V Sahai; Paul D James; Michael J Levy; Gregory Monkewich; Jonathan Wyse
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.