Literature DB >> 21921849

The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the Johns Hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.

Peter C Austin1, Carl van Walraven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Logistic regression models that incorporated age, sex, and indicator variables for the Johns Hopkins' Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) categories have been shown to accurately predict all-cause mortality in adults.
OBJECTIVES: To develop 2 different point-scoring systems using the ADGs. The Mortality Risk Score (MRS) collapses age, sex, and the ADGs to a single summary score that predicts the annual risk of all-cause death in adults. The ADG Score derives weights for the individual ADG diagnosis groups. RESEARCH
DESIGN: : Retrospective cohort constructed using population-based administrative data. PARTICIPANTS: All 10,498,413 residents of Ontario, Canada, between the age of 20 and 100 years who were alive on their birthday in 2007, participated in this study. Participants were randomly divided into derivation and validation samples. MEASURES: : Death within 1 year.
RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the MRS ranged from -21 to 139 (median value 29, IQR 17 to 44). In the validation group, a logistic regression model with the MRS as the sole predictor significantly predicted the risk of 1-year mortality with a c-statistic of 0.917. A regression model with age, sex, and the ADG Score has similar performance. Both methods accurately predicted the risk of 1-year mortality across the 20 vigintiles of risk.
CONCLUSIONS: The MRS combined values for a person's age, sex, and the John Hopkins ADGs to accurately predict 1-year mortality in adults. The ADG Score is a weighted score representing the presence or absence of the 32 ADG diagnosis groups. These scores will facilitate health services researchers conducting risk adjustment using administrative health care databases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21921849      PMCID: PMC4617828          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318229360e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients?

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Frank E Harrell; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions.

Authors:  Lisa M Sullivan; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Vijaya Sundararajan; Toni Henderson; Catherine Perry; Amanda Muggivan; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management.

Authors:  B Starfield; J Weiner; L Mumford; D Steinwachs
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Carl van Walraven; Walter P Wodchis; Alice Newman; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.

Authors:  J P Weiner; B H Starfield; D M Steinwachs; L M Mumford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  37 in total

1.  The Impact of Improved Population Life Expectancy in Survival Trend Analyses of Specific Diseases.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Epidemiology of Interpersonal Trauma among Women and Men Psychiatric Inpatients: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Evgenia Gatov; Nicole Koziel; Paul Kurdyak; Natasha R Saunders; Maria Chiu; Michael Lebenbaum; Simon Chen; Simone N Vigod
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  The value of complementing administrative data with abstracted information on smoking and obesity: A study in kidney cancer.

Authors:  Madhur Nayan; Robert J Hamilton; Antonio Finelli; Peter C Austin; Girish S Kulkarni; David N Juurlink
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  The uptake of active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Tony Panzarella; Laurence Klotz; Maria Komisarenko; Neil E Fleshner; David Urbach; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Acute risk of suicide and suicide attempts associated with recent diagnosis of mental disorders: a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Jason R Randall; Randy Walld; Greg Finlayson; Jitender Sareen; Patricia J Martens; James M Bolton
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  An audit of referral and treatment patterns of high-risk prostate cancer patients in Alberta.

Authors:  Majed Alghamdi; Amandeep Taggar; Derek Tilley; Marc Kerba; Xanthoula Kostaras; Geoffrey Gotto; Michael Sia
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  MS risk in immigrants in the McDonald era: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Dalia L Rotstein; Ruth Ann Marrie; Colleen Maxwell; Sima Gandhi; Susan E Schultz; Kinwah Fung; Karen Tu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Regional health care services and rates of lower extremity amputation related to diabetes and peripheral artery disease: an ecological study.

Authors:  Charles de Mestral; Mohamad A Hussain; Peter C Austin; Thomas L Forbes; Atul Sivaswamy; Ahmed Kayssi; Konrad Salata; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Subodh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-10-27

9.  Mortality among patients with frequent emergency department use for alcohol-related reasons in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Hulme; Hasan Sheikh; Edward Xie; Evgenia Gatov; Chenthila Nagamuthu; Paul Kurdyak
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Surgical versus Medical Castration for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Use and Overall Survival in a National Cohort.

Authors:  Adam B Weiner; Jason E Cohen; John O DeLancey; Edward M Schaeffer; Gregory B Auffenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.