| Literature DB >> 28598975 |
Amelia Chiara Trombetta1, Vanessa Smith2, Emanuele Gotelli1, Massimo Ghio1, Sabrina Paolino1, Carmen Pizzorni1, Amber Vanhaecke2, Barbara Ruaro1, Alberto Sulli1, Maurizio Cutolo1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) correlations with clinical parameters and evaluation of the efficacy of standard oral supplementation in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28598975 PMCID: PMC5466326 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Medsger’s disease severity scale (DSS) parameters in the study population.
In the left part of the figure, a graphic representation describes organ involvement through the distribution of the five values (0 to 4) for each parameter of Medsger’s DSS (white = none, light grey = mild, intermediate grey = moderate, dark grey = severe, black = end-stage). In the right part of the figure the same distribution is described in percentages (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = end-stage).
The table describes patients’ clinical characteristics, starting from personal data (age and gender), disease specific characteristics (disease subtype in percentages, autoantibody positivity in percentages, Raynaud’s phenomenon and disease durations, general digital ulcer incidence and according to pattern of microangiopathy).
| Patients clinical characteristics | TOT 154 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 59 ±15 | |||
| W = 131 (85) | |||
| M = 23 (15) | |||
| 25 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 15 | |||
| 28.2 | |||
| 56.4 | |||
| 13.4 ±12.7 | |||
| 6.5 ±6.3 | |||
| 32 | |||
| “Early”: 8 | (p<0.0001) | ||
| “Active”: 33 | |||
| “Late”: 34 | |||
| 18.7 ±9 | |||
| Italy: 18 ±10 | (p = 0.99) | ||
| Belgium: 19 ±9 | |||
| Winter: 14.6 ±7.8 | (p = 0.032) | ||
| Spring: 17.2 ±7.9 | |||
| Summer: 21.43 ±10 | |||
| Autumn: 20.2 ±10 | |||
| 9.3 ±0.4 | |||
| 28.6 ±14 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 18.1 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 61 | |||
| 7.8 | |||
25(OH)D serum levels are reported as mean ± standard deviation and p value for all patients, according to patients region of origin and according to season in which the patient has been evaluated). PTH serum levels are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Treatments regimens considered relevant were reported as percentages of patients’ population. W = women; M = men; DcSSc = diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; lcSSc = limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; LSSc = limited systemic sclerosis; Anti-Scl 70 Ab = anti–topoisomerase I antibody; ACA = anti-centromere antibody; RP = Raynaud’s phenomenon; DUs = digital ulcers; NVC = Nailfold Videocapillaorscopy; PAH = pulmonary artery hypertension.
The table describes organ involvement in patients population as assessed through laboratory (creatinine levels) and instrumental parameters: Average pulmonary function test measurements (DLCO%, FVC% and FVC%/DLCO% ratio), average echocardiographic estimation of SPAP values, patients percentage showing interstitial lung disease or bi-basal fibrotic changes at lung CT scan, patients percentage showing enlarged hearth at chest X-rays, patients percentage showing ECG alterations (conduction disorders and arrhythmias), patients percentage for each nailfold videocapillaroscopic pattern.
| Laboratory and instrumental parameters | TOT 154 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine levels (mg/dl) | 1.01 ±0.4 | ||
| DLCO % (mean ±SD) | 75 ±18 | ||
| FVC% (mean ±SD) | 104 ±21 | ||
| FVC%/DLCO% (mean ±SD) | 1.4 ±0.4 | ||
| sPAP (mean ±SD) | 31.6 ±7 | ||
| Interstitial lung disease (%) | 46 | ||
| Bi-basal fibrotic changes (%) | 44 | ||
| Enlarged heart (%) | 12 | ||
| Conduction disorder (%) | 19 | ||
| Arrythmias (%) | 5 | ||
| Patterns (%) | Early | 15.6 | |
| Active | 34.3 | ||
| Late | 50 | ||
DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; SD = standard deviation; FVC = forced vital capacity, sPAP = systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, NVC = Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy.
Fig 225(OH)D serum levels and significant correlations.
A) Average 25(OH)D serum concentrations in all seasons: a statistically significant difference was observed among seasonal 25(OH)D serum concentrations (p = 0.032). The Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test shows a more significant difference between patients observed in winter compared to summer months (p = 0.0086). B) Average 25(OH)D serum concentrations in patients showing presence/absence of bi-basal fibrotic changes at lung CT scan: a statistically significant difference was found between 25(OH)D serum concentrations in patients showing presence vs absence of bi-basal fibrotic changes at lung CT scan (p = 0.04). C) Medsger’s disease severity scale “peripheral vascular” parameter correlation with 25(OH)D serum concentrations (p = 0.03).D) Medsger’s disease severity scale “kidney” parameter correlation with 25(OH)D serum concentrations (p = 0.02). E) Medsger’s disease severity scale “gastro-intestinal” parameter correlation with 25(OH)D serum concentrations (p = 0.05).
In the left part of the table DXA scan parameters average values in all patients population are shown.
In the right part of the table there are p values for correlation of DXA scan data with 25(OH)D serum levels and with glucocorticoid therapy.
| DXA Scan Data | Mean ± SD | Correlation with | Correlation with | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| serum 25(OH)D | glucocorticoid therapy | |||
| (p values) | (p values) | |||
| L1-L4 | BMD | 0.9 ±0.17 | 0.36 | 0.14 |
| T SCORE | -1.5 ±1.4 | 0.83 | 0.13 | |
| Z SCORE | 0.2 ±1.2 | 0.87 | 0.36 | |
| Neck | BMD | 0.7 ±0.1 | 0.38 | 0.98 |
| T SCORE | -2 ±0.9 | 0.43 | 0.47 | |
| Z SCORE | -0.5 ±0.8 | 0.19 | 0.6 | |
| Ward | BMD | 0.5 ±0.1 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| T SCORE | -2.7 ±0.8 | 0.83 | 0.44 | |
| Z SCORE | -0.7 ±0.7 | 0.41 | 0.7 | |
| Trochanteric | BMD | 0.6 ±0.1 | 0.39 | 0.33 |
| T SCORE | -1.1 ±0.9 | 0.51 | 0.16 | |
| Z SCORE | -0.3 ±0.8 | 0.50 | 0.18 | |
| Whole | BMD | 0.8 ±0.1 | 0.48 | 0.24 |
| T SCORE | -1.6 ±0.9 | 0.56 | 0.14 | |
| Z SCORE | -0.3 ±0.8 | 0.41 | 0.21 | |
No correlations were observed between 25(OH)D serum concentration and bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), hip, and proximal femur. No correlations were observed among dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan data and glucocorticoid therapy assumption.
Fig 325(OH)D serum concentrations and treatment.
25(OH)D serum concentrations compared in patients assuming/not assuming supplementation with 1,000 IU daily for at least 6–12 months. There was no influence of treatments with oral colecalciferol on 25(OH)D serum concentrations: 18.8 ±10 ng/ml in treated and 18.7 ±9 ng/ml in untreated patients (p = 0.81).