Literature DB >> 23168298

Long-term vitamin D3 supplementation is more effective than vitamin D2 in maintaining serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status over the winter months.

Victoria F Logan1, Andrew R Gray, Meredith C Peddie, Michelle J Harper, Lisa A Houghton.   

Abstract

Public health recommendations do not distinguish between vitamin D2 and vitamin D3, yet disagreement exists on whether these two forms should be considered equivalent. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a daily physiological dose of vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status over the winter months in healthy adults living in Dunedin, New Zealand (latitude 46°S). Participants aged 18-50 years were randomly assigned to 25 μg (1000 IU) vitamin D3 (n 32), 25 μg (1000 IU) vitamin D2 (n 31) or placebo (n 32) daily for 25 weeks beginning at the end of summer. A per-protocol approach, which included ≥ 90 % supplement compliance, was used for all analyses. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, 13 and 25 weeks. Geometric mean total serum 25(OH)D concentrations (sum of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3) at baseline was 80 nmol/l. After 25 weeks, participants randomised to D2 and placebo had a significant reduction in serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations over the winter months compared with vitamin D3-supplemented participants (both P< 0.001). Supplementation with vitamin D2 increased serum 25(OH)D2 but produced a 9 (95 % CI 1, 17) nmol/l greater decline in the 25(OH)D3 metabolite compared with placebo (P< 0.036). Overall, total serum 25(OH)D concentrations were 21 (95 % CI 14, 30) nmol/l lower in participants receiving vitamin D2 compared with those receiving D3 (P< 0.001), among whom total serum 25(OH)D concentrations remained unchanged. No intervention-related changes in PTH were observed. Daily supplementation of vitamin D3 was more effective than D2; however, the functional consequence of the differing metabolic response warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168298     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512002851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  35 in total

1.  The Role of Vitamin D in Pediatric Asthma.

Authors:  Selene K Bantz; Zhou Zhu; Tao Zheng
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Child Health       Date:  2015

2.  Model-based meta-analysis for comparing Vitamin D2 and D3 parent-metabolite pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Alanna S Ocampo-Pelland; Marc R Gastonguay; Matthew M Riggs
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Vitamin D and MRI measures in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Justin R Abbatemarco; Robert J Fox; Hong Li; Daniel Ontaneda
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 4.  Protecting Bone Health in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: Pharmacological Considerations.

Authors:  Yujuan Zhang; Diana Milojevic
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  The effect of monthly 50,000 IU or 100,000 IU vitamin D supplements on vitamin D status in premenopausal Middle Eastern women living in Auckland.

Authors:  H Mazahery; W Stonehouse; P R von Hurst
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The 3 epimer of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol is present in the circulation of the majority of adults in a nationally representative sample and has endogenous origins.

Authors:  Kevin D Cashman; Michael Kinsella; Janette Walton; Albert Flynn; Aoife Hayes; Alice J Lucey; Kelly M Seamans; Mairead Kiely
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Vitamin D supplementation improves pathophysiology in a rat model of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Jessica L Faulkner; Denise C Cornelius; Lorena M Amaral; Ashlyn C Harmon; Mark W Cunningham; Marie M Darby; Tarek Ibrahim; D'Andrea S Thomas; Florian Herse; Gerd Wallukat; Ralf Dechend; Babbette LaMarca
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?

Authors:  J M Quesada-Gomez; R Bouillon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the response of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration to vitamin D supplementation from RCTs from around the globe.

Authors:  Minjia Mo; Shijie Wang; Zun Chen; Xiamusiye Muyiduli; Shuojia Wang; Yu Shen; Bule Shao; Minchao Li; Danqing Chen; Zexin Chen; Yunxian Yu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Vitamin D Levels and Visual System Measurements in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Justin R Abbatemarco; Robert J Fox; Hong Li; Robert A Bermel; Daniel Ontaneda
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.