Literature DB >> 28598920

Aerosolized Vasodilators for the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mahsa Elmi-Sarabi1, Alain Deschamps, Stéphane Delisle, Hosham Ased, François Haddad, Yoan Lamarche, Louis P Perrault, Jean Lambert, Alexis F Turgeon, André Y Denault.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cardiac surgery, pulmonary hypertension is an important prognostic factor for which several treatments have been suggested over time. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy of inhaled aerosolized vasodilators to intravenously administered agents and to placebo in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension during cardiac surgery. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to October 2015. The incidence of mortality was assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit, and evaluation of the hemodynamic profile.
METHODS: Of the 2897 citations identified, 10 studies were included comprising a total of 434 patients.
RESULTS: Inhaled aerosolized agents were associated with a significant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (-41.36 dyne·s/cm, P= .03) and a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (8.24 mm Hg, P= .02) and right ventricular ejection fraction (7.29%, P< .0001) when compared to intravenously administered agents. No significant hemodynamically meaningful differences were observed between inhaled agents and placebo; however, an increase in length of stay in the intensive care unit was shown with the use of inhaled aerosolized agents (0.66 days, P= .01). No other differences were observed for either comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of inhaled aerosolized vasodilators for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension during cardiac surgery is associated with improved right ventricular performance when compared to intravenously administered agents. This review does not support any benefit compared to placebo on major outcomes. Further investigation is warranted in this area of research and should focus on clinically significant outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28598920     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Correct Answer Is "NO".

Authors:  Fumito Ichinose; Warren M Zapol
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  [Acute perioperative right heart insufficiency : Diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  B Schäfer; C-A Greim
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients.

Authors:  Jie Li; Ashley E Augustynovich; Payal K Gurnani; James B Fink
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-08-21

4.  Comparison of inhaled nitric oxide with aerosolized prostacyclin or analogues for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hong Chen; Li-Kuei Chen; Tsung-Han Teng; Wei-Han Chou
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Nebulized Nitroglycerin for Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Benjamin T Daxon; Erin Lark; Luke J Matzek; Amanda R Fields; Kyle J Haselton
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2021-02-05

6.  Effects of Inhaled Epoprostenol and Prone Positioning in Intubated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients With Refractory Hypoxemia.

Authors:  Jie Li; James B Fink; Ashley E Augustynovich; Sara Mirza; Richard H Kallet; Rajiv Dhand
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Postoperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Austria : A national survey on current clinical practice in hemodynamic monitoring and postoperative management.

Authors:  Johannes Menger; Maximilian Edlinger-Stanger; Martin Dworschak; Barbara Steinlechner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.704

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.